this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
543 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

13279 readers
3652 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] illi@lemm.ee 124 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the title, I think I'd never got it otherwise

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like sarcasm, but the joke legitimately didn't click for me until I scanned the title again.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

It wasn't. I legitimately wouldn't get it otherwise. Which I also don't necessarily see as a bad thing either in this case.

[–] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fuck gawd damn, I don’t know who I’m angrier at more: myself or the joke writer.

The humor lies in the dual meaning of the horticultural labor task and the selective bias fallacy having the same idiomatic phrase of “cherry picking”. And that is all there is to the humor.

Right?

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Thank you for explaining. I'm embarrassed I didn't get it on my own but I'm grateful for the help.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 49 points 1 day ago

I thought it was because they were all dying and fertilizing the soil with their corpses.

[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Could be because I was still asleep 20 minutes ago.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Anti vaxers cherry pick information to state their claims are correct. Therefore they're super good at it

[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ahhhhhhhhhh. That would make sense. My mind initially was asking if there was some form of an extract or essential oil that came from cherries that they claimed was a wonder anti drug.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought the death rate among antivaxers was so high that they provide regular fertilization for the trees.

[–] Pot8o@mander.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

That was my thought too. Nothing like a bit of blood and bone to get plants growing. Something, something...it's what plants crave!

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's also a sort of second level to the joke in that reporting on the results for a single orchard is in itself cherry picking.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My dumbass thought it was programming related

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

I thought like the cherry picker carts that help you drive around at elevated altitude

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I thought they kept dying and adding nurtiants to the soil

[–] fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the sleepy brains and ESL-ers: It is an idiom.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I still don't get the 340% increase in the production part though.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 24 points 1 day ago

They're very experienced at cherry picking, since they do it all the time. Therefore they're able to do it better / faster than most.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anti-vaxxers love cherry picking.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me either, but assuming it's a real screenshot, the date is 2018. I didn't do much digging, but 2018 saw an increase in cherry crops according to this source https://upnorthlive.com/news/local/usda-2018-cherry-crop-production-up-from-last-year.

An overall increase of 60% is pretty big! If this specific farm had an especially bad year in 2017, a 340% increase isn't out of the question.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don't get the Jo try this:

Citing extensive experience, anti-vaxers are hired by cherry farm as cherry pickers.

One such cherry picker was shown to pick cherries 340% faster than non-anti-vax pickers. The anti-vax cherry picking spokesman was heard to be explaining that this data proves anti-vaxers are the superior farm laborers, and expects the farm to see a correlation in overall productivity improvement across farms employing anti-vax cherry pickers.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

But that's cherry picking!

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've never seen it as "vaccers" only "vaxxers". Also, 2018!

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

What's a vakker?

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

They're vaccers because they suck.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago

If you don't get the joke: the cherry farm was planted over the graves of all the antivaxers.

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This picture is going to be cited by someone as actual evidence against vaccines. I guarantee it.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

It'd be the same quality as their other evidence, so it might as well be funny

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] XiELEd@lemmy.world 51 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's a joke about them being good at cherry-picking

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've never picked cherries but I have pruned persimmon trees and I am skeptical that anti vaxxers would excel at any kind of agricultural work

[–] T156@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

"Cherry picking" is also a form of selective arguing, where someone will laser focus on one tiny part of the data, even if the rest of it says things contrary to their point.

So, if I had data saying that 70% of people who trod on landmines died immediately, 25% experienced loss of at least one limb, 2.5% were unharmed, and 2.5% were unaccounted for, a Cherry-picker might argue that landmine hopscotch is completely safe, since only 25% of people lost a limb, and a portion of people were completely unharmed.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago

The picture of the orchard had fooled me.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

"Anti Vaxxers in demand as orchards seek expert cherry pickers"

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

I love stealth puns

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I figured they were making hugel mounds out of the dead people and planting cherries on them.