this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
775 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

8267 readers
1209 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 128 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Never ask a Lemming what kind of leftist they are, or what is the best Linux distro.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, um, whatever kind you use and whatever kind you are, of course.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

That's your favorite distro of linux now, but what previous operating system do you come from?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What if he's a Gentoo user? He'll mock me for using Archlinux, I've got to play this hand carefully so as to not blow my cover. There's always the chance he's a Mint user and I have nothing to worry about, but then, he could be one of those users that says ricing is a waste of time, who uses his OS professionally, but then, he might be a Fedora user... how do I approach this issue without seeming like a pleb?! Based Stallman, help me!

NixOS

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

What kind of leftist are you and what is the best Linux distro?

[–] simpolomeo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

anarcho-communist, arch

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Post-left anarchist, Arch obv

I don't use Arch but that wasn't the question

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago

Debian-syndicalist

[–] Nay@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago

Social-Debianist

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I just want people to have food, shelter and healthcare at an affordable price.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Some call this “Leftist extremism”. =/

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ugh George Soros poisoned Progressivism!

By "affordable" I'm assuming you mean free. Always wanting a handout, of course.

I just want untaxed inheritance, corporate welfare on top of more tax breaks for me and all my friends, unregulated surveillance and data collection of the plebs so I can continue to make even more money (untaxed obvs), exclusive and elite private universities, and a justice system where I can live free of consequence and purchase a judge at a reasonable price because I believe in being fiscally conservative.

Food, shelter, and healthcare are things I've just never had to think about really. Although, I would also prefer that if too many people are worrying about those things in my immediate vicinity, they be shuffled around or forcibly moved to a different vicinity.

That way I don't have to start thinking too much. It's really unfair when that happens, because it starts to make me feel all kinds of uncomfortable. Uncomfortable is not something I'm used to feeling, and since I don't like to think about things, I never stop and think about why somebody else being uncomfortable would also make me feel so uncomfortable.

Logically, the solution is to just put those people somewhere not visible to me, and then complain about what society is "turning into these days" when they slip through the privilege perimeter.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Really good film. He nailed his role. So much so it was a little scary how good he was.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they hadn't done "east west" instead of some other cardinal directions, it would probably be prophetic

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The moment I heard "alliance between California and Texas" I was detached from the movie. That is literally the least likely alliance I could think of

[–] unknown@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The point of the film is to show how horrible war is in a context Americans can relate to. If they made a more realistic alliance, down some sort of real life right / left politics the message would be lost and it would be held up as some sort of propaganda film by one side of politics with the other side using it to justify why they're correct.

So, yes the "alliance between the California and Texas" is a very deliberate choice.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Also the idea of the two most economically independent and arguably most "separatist" US states forming an alliance in a modern civil war is really not the stretch that most Americans with their ideology blinders on might feel it is. Two large polities that wish to be sovereign lean on each other to support their parallel ends? That's actually tenable world-building, I think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

It was a bit much to work with, but once I realized that the civil war itself and the whys weren't what the movie was about, I went with it. This scene was the most disturbing of them all. Maybe because it's not that hard to imagine some people going this far. I'm sure there's some veterans of various conflicts that would agree and saw it happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cas@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago

This scene really got to me, this was the first time I really felt how awful war is

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Jesse Plemons needs more lead roles. He reminds me of Phillip Seymour Hoffman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm so tired of the labels, I just want things to be better for everyone

[–] Fiction@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

"The kind with trigger discipline..."

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Anti-Conservative

There is no such thing as liberalism — or progressivism, etc.

There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation.

There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or “progressivism”, or “socialism”, or whatever-the-fuck-kind-of-stupid-noise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Also, those who insist on political purity tests reveal themselves to be temporarily-inconvenienced-dictators-in-waiting.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Get your finger out of the trigger guard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (21 children)

The anti right wing/trump kind.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

An armed one.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 18 points 1 week ago

The kind that got chucked off reddit for being mean to Trump, Musk and Netanyahu.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

What kind am I?

Not a neo liberal or a Tankie.

I'm in-between. I'm caring enough to not agree with Conservatives and want a change to the status quo. I'm educated enough to know how the world actually works and that things can't be free and other people won't do stuff for free. Capitalism has its place, but needs to be highly regulated.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You can be anti-capitalist without being a "tankie." It seems like your position is driven by your aversion to those you perceive as being to your right and to your left rather than on a consistent ideological framework.

I'm educated enough to know how the world actually works and that things can't be free and other people won't do stuff for free.

This is capitalist realism. Your education has not made you smart enough to see that capitalism is reality, it has made you so set in your constrained worldview that you've become incapable of imagining anything outside of the framework of capitalism. For the majority of time that humans have existed on earth they have organized themselves in a myriad of different ways without the need for private property and exploitation of others. I recommend reading some anthropology, I personally prefer David Graeber.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Idk. The kind where I believe that every adult over 18 should be given 80m2 by the government. Apartment, office space, storage space, workshop, lab, whatever.

I believe that you shouldn't need to worry about a place to live at the bare minimum, and I believe that not having space for people to use and experiment with is one of the main hindrances of economic development (development, not "growth")

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm the leftist from the Church of the SubGenius.
And Slackware ftw!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You know those means of production?

Well I have an idea...

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I wish there was a test.

Not a bullshit CosmoBuzzfeed quiz, but an actual "if you answered A on these three questions, you tend towards MarxoCapitalist. Here's a community full of people who mostly agree with you about political stuff."

We'd still have Home and Local and All, but it'd be nice to know who my people are instead of needing a college degree to navigate the bullshit everyone says about everyone else.

I don't think anyone knows what socialism is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Oh, I'm not a leftist. My perspective is a bit more nuanced and complex than that. I am unburdened by ideology. I am the adult in the room. I am a centrist. 😌

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Left handed leftist!

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The fundamental objective of leftism is the dispersion of sociopolitical power as widely and evenly as possible, with an ideal (neither realized or considered possible) in which each person has no more and no less power than any other.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments