this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
615 points (94.6% liked)

Political Memes

8106 readers
2505 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Really good film. He nailed his role. So much so it was a little scary how good he was.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they hadn't done "east west" instead of some other cardinal directions, it would probably be prophetic

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

The moment I heard "alliance between California and Texas" I was detached from the movie. That is literally the least likely alliance I could think of

[–] unknown@sh.itjust.works 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The point of the film is to show how horrible war is in a context Americans can relate to. If they made a more realistic alliance, down some sort of real life right / left politics the message would be lost and it would be held up as some sort of propaganda film by one side of politics with the other side using it to justify why they're correct.

So, yes the "alliance between the California and Texas" is a very deliberate choice.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Also the idea of the two most economically independent and arguably most "separatist" US states forming an alliance in a modern civil war is really not the stretch that most Americans with their ideology blinders on might feel it is. Two large polities that wish to be sovereign lean on each other to support their parallel ends? That's actually tenable world-building, I think.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I believe in the lore, California and Texas both secede from the Union following an unpopular president getting a third term. The rest of the Gulf states secede as the Florida Alliance, and the Northwest secede in some other alliance not directly named but usually listed as Western Forces.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 22 hours ago

It was a bit much to work with, but once I realized that the civil war itself and the whys weren't what the movie was about, I went with it. This scene was the most disturbing of them all. Maybe because it's not that hard to imagine some people going this far. I'm sure there's some veterans of various conflicts that would agree and saw it happen.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

There are pluralities of leftist in Texas, and wrongists in California. There would probably be two alliances between them, one on each side.

[–] cas@feddit.nl 13 points 1 day ago

This scene really got to me, this was the first time I really felt how awful war is

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Dublin112@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The movie is called Civil War

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Jesse Plemons needs more lead roles. He reminds me of Phillip Seymour Hoffman.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 hours ago

You could hear a pin drop in the theatre when this scene dropped, it was just too real.