this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
325 points (98.8% liked)

politics

23595 readers
2754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 172 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Since when does the executive branch control what universities do with enrollment?

[–] rslogix89@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When it tries to be a wannabe fascist.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Slowly becoming less wannabe and more gonna be.

[–] TheLemming@lemm.ee 32 points 23 hours ago

Not even gonna be, we're there.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 36 points 1 day ago

They can deny student visas

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

By denying all student visas

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I never cared much for Harvard, the elitism, legacy enrollments, and all things snooty about it.

I have to say that they are they're crushing it on their defiance against this regime.

The Dean over at Columbia should take notes.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Of the schools that can afford to mount a defense, it's Harvard.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

They all can mount a defense.

No one is required to comply with nonsense.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're saying they have lots of money and competent lawyers.

In order to win in US courts, you need lots of money and good lawyers. Harvard has more money and lawyers than basically any Uni in the US

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I see.

You were assuming I meant resisting through arguing and legal proceedings, which this regime has complete contempt for.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 15 hours ago

Exactly, and by all mounting a defence, none are singles out.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Every single Ivy League school and many prestigious (like top 75ish) schools in America have an “endowment” worth x amount but also a whole separate money cannon if you piss off the alumni. I don’t donate directly to my university but I would if Trump came for them. And I’m, sadly, not a billionaire but they exist.

You can tell I’m not a billionaire because if I were, I wouldn’t be posting on this broke ass web site. I’d be off the coast of the Riviera in the hot tub on my yacht getting a foot massage from a mysterious, ethereal beauty known only as “La Marionnette.” (I’d have a team of old timey whalers to fend off the Orca attacks. I’m not as stupid as a real billionaire.)

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

You can do a lot of shit with 50 Billy in the bank. Other schools don't have the luxury. Which is a separate and more concerning problem.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Bending the knee is for wimps.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I will not bend the knee

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

50 Billy

I'm curious. Is this a new term, a thing Australians say, a reference from some media I missed, or just something that's fun to say?

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

50 billion dollars is how much the Harvard endowment is worth. Money they can draw from for any reason including to hire the best Harvard lawyers to fight the government with or to pay ongoing costs of drinking the school of the government takes away any money they were previously giving the school. Other schools don't have this type of money so they have to do what the government says or cease to exist.

[–] Neuromorph@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

As snobby as it it is. It hosts all aspects of society. Harvard law school has a trap and skeet team that's very pro 2A. On its own it's not too shocking. But this is in very Blue Massachusetts.

Similar to how MIT has pistol and rifle clubs.

You have the opportunity to share various hobbies and political leanings all in a bubble of elitism.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If Harvard gives in, Trump will do this again.

Harvard is better off with the damage being done than by giving up things it doesn't have to give up and still having the damage done at a later point.

They're in it for the long-haul. If they roll over now they'll absolutely get crushed. Letting people and organizations get away with defiance, even for a moment, is weakness and authoritarians can't ever appear weak.

I can only imagine how many foreign-born lawyers exist among their alumni, who care personally enough about this matter to fight pro-bono.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this a small government?

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 28 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

TLDR:

The Trump administration barred Harvard from enrolling or retaining international students, accusing the school of fostering antisemitism, violence, and ties to China.

DHS revoked Harvard’s student visa program certification, forcing current foreign students to transfer or lose status.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the administration from acting against current students.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

God, I am not even from the US, but it makes me so mad... Fuck each and every Republican voter for voting for that mf!!

And the idiots who could have voted against it, but didn't

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

There's quite few of them. Dont fall for their propaganda trying to divide and conquer

Point the finger at the plutocrats. Establish a democracy.

Trump is deeply unpopular and never would have stolen power if we had a democracy.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 23 points 1 day ago

It's incredible how thoroughly the US is self-destructing, especially when it comes to its soft-power

[–] lazyViking@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

So much for the "private" in the private sector lol

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

trump has a miserably tiny pee pee

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh not you, bro. No, yours is mighty and tiny. Not miserable at all. Unless you’re a corrupt demented rapist and didn’t mention that part.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Ah I see, thanks

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

DHS said that in addition to barring enrollment of future international students, "existing foreign students must transfer to lose their legal status." The revocation, which DHS said was the result of "pro-terrorist conduct," was first reported by The New York Times.

What does it mean that they “must transfer to lose”? Is she saying if they transfer they lose their status and that that transfer is being forced, or that they must transfer or lose it?

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Typo? "or* lose..."

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

It reads like they are saying a student would have to transfer to lose status. So current students are fine, but if they transfer their visa is revoked.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Tell us where the talking llama is and we’ll burn your house to the ground!

Uh, don't you mean 'or'?

Ugh! Tell us where the talking llama is or we’ll burn your house to the ground!

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just when i think they cannot get any lower.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hold my beer!