politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Can you be more specific about what you think their job details?
"self-flagellate".... No I want them to stop sitting on their asses, self fellating.
Well duh !
I do want them to self-flagellate…the useless bums they have currently in office, and replace them with people with gonads.
We want to stand up to Trump's stock manipulation: but Nacy Pelosi keeps blocking bills making congressional insider trading illegal.
We want to stand up to Trump's support for multiple genocidal dictators, but Chuck Schumer keeps pushing for more weapons to Israel.
We want to make majauana legal, but Kamala Harris keeps touting how she had sent majauana users to jail.
In short, we want democratic leaders who stand for democratic values or at least who don't actively push policies counter to them.
Wanna win over people Dems? Stop pearl clutching and swear at the cunts like the motherfuckers they are.
One of the only comments here to have any actual suggestions, and it's "use harsh language." Even then, though, do you want them to use harsh language sparingly or until they get thrown out of congress in session?
Look, you need shock value to turn heads these days. That's why the manosphere succeeded the way it has. That's why the fascists in power got the support they got. It's all about speaking at a level that the people can relate to.
If you want to stick to Victorian norms of grammar and etiquette, you get nowhere.
Besides, foul language isn't a sure sign of stupidity:
https://www.sciencealert.com/swearing-is-a-sign-of-more-intelligence-not-less-say-scientists
Pretty good article. And they're completely right.
DNC: "Best we can do is approving of Trump's horrid cabinet picks, voting for internet censorship, and abandoning queer people because trans people are icky."
I'd be way more enthusiastic to vote and donate and advocate if Dems weren't just shooting the democracy they claim to protect in the foot and then handing Republicans the gun to keep it bleeding.
I want them to actually fight Trump. Or follow on the promises of arresting him from 2021 to now. Or enact policies that don't make people consider fascism because they're desperate and fed propaganda.
But that would cost money and anger the donators who back Trump and them, so controlled opposition it is!
Can we just hit the baseline and have Democrats NOT vote against their party's interest?
Maybe I'm just cherry picking but policies in the past decade passed by a Democrat has been like 90% Democrats/ 0% Republicans approve.
But policies passed by a Republican is like 100% Republican / 20% Democrats approved.
The problem with that idea is that the Dems have been about the status quo for so long that it's literally why Trump won. People aren't voting Dems because they went the "don't rock the boat" route for so long.
The Dems need a reform.
As a side note, I recently learned about what a giant piece of shit Jake Tapper is regarding his advocacy for Israel’s genocide as part of pretending to be a journalist. I don’t watch CNN, but for some reason I had the impression he was a commentator with some amount of integrity.
I hope AOC can take over for Bernie.
Dems and Republicans want the same thing. A kleptocracy.
Why would Dems stand up to anyone writing their bonus checks?
A little bit late. We now have a one-party dictatorship, which will one day collapse on its own. But not in this decade.
Dems are dead we need a new party under Bernie Sanders
Have you considered listening to what Bernie Sanders suggests, instead? Because his plan is not abandoning the dems in the slightest, though he does support if an established dem switches to independent.
Um.. a good contingent of those voters didn't vote. They did this to themselves.