this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
1045 points (96.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31503 readers
4359 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One landlord: “How will I pay my bills?”

Their multitude of tenants and their families: “How will WE pay our bills?!”

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Landlord: "(dead serious) That's not my problem!"

[–] LouSlash@sh.itjust.works 75 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Always remember that "the market" is just a signal to the landlord that they could get more if the property were on the market today. It's still their choice to squeeze you to take advantage of that. "It's the market" is code for "because I can".

Also they know that people don't want to move every year or two, so they can absolutely raise the rent above market level without you wanting to leave yet. This has the effect of pushing the market higher. The switching cost is very high, so it's in their favour that way too.

A landlord I knew about through a friend said they never raised the rent as long as their property is being paid off, because they would rather have it occupied and being paid than the tenants leave and the place sit empty.

Not to say that's a good landlord by any means, but there is a choice. The market isn't a mandate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_grass_trainer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Peter Parker: "you'll get your rent when you fix the damn DOOR!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Every time I see these posts: The happiest countries in the world are consistently: The Nordic countries are often considered happy due to high levels of social trust, strong welfare systems, and low income inequality, which contribute to a sense of security and well-being among their citizens. Additionally, their effective governance and access to quality public services play a significant role in enhancing overall life satisfaction. These governments are working for the people, not oligarchs.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hella expensive property though. For my Baltic ass anyway

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They're the foundation of society, I say!

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Private property yes, personal property no

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago (9 children)

The way i distinguish:

property in that you have a piece of paper saying something is yours and you can prevent people from using that thing or extract value from it, while not using it yourself. That’s theft.

But possession, ie. having things that you use, a house you live in etc. that’s not theft unless other circumstances that lead to the possession are theft.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We're on the same page then.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

It's all about terminology. I like the concept of usofruct where your right to own something is bound to either use it directly or collect its fruits (in a literal or figurative sense). So a landlord wouldn't own a house but the people living there would. This has it's roots in Roman law where ownership had three aspects: usus, fructus and abusus (misuse, destroy, ...)

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

cars have paper attached to them, should people be forced to use cars to keep them?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is so obvious I don't understand why it needs highlighting. Nobody here is suggesting you cannot have stuff.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

/u/Zexks@lemmy.world is doing so.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"How will I pay my bills"

(Democratic) Socialism, UBI, and fair wages.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

it's insane how deep propaganda has drilled into the heads of people where you have to specify the socialism is democratic

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, there are a lot of tankies advocating for the non-democratic type.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago

There are many kinds of socialism, democratic socialism being one of them

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

New to lemmy?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I mean, you can go one further and establish public utilities that ration resources per capita instead of charging a vig on top of the production cost.

Why do I need UBI and wages if I can just claim a vacant apartment and be guaranteed power/telecom, of which their are millions nationally?

We could divert the tens of billions (converted to energy/man hours) we're throwing away on AI subsidies and everyone can live a comfortable middle class life free of charge.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

AI subsidies?

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes but yokels in the flyover states will say no, so you're not allowed to do this.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You give the yokels far too little credit. Quite a few of them are convinced it is the liberals who want to means test away their quality of life and expose them to the predation of foreign markets.

And they're often right. DLC liberals were perfectly fine with Midwestern deindustrialized, education privatization, military expansion, and corrosive financialization. The problem is that they're boxed in, with nowhere to go. Conservatives ensconced them in a media monopoly, screaming a partial truth - that liberal business interests have fully compromised their wing of government. That's made selling "we're all you've got" an incredibly powerful message on the right. Even as the Congressional paymasters tip both parties generously.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Microw@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is landlord a "job" where you live?

I think every single person I know who owns a house/flat and rents to someone has of course a regular job where he works at. Wouldn't be financially viable in any form otherwise (and it shouldn't be).

[–] nroth@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are some people who own a bunch of properties and their job is maintaining them and dealing with the paperwork. And then there are some people who passively collect income and have a management company do that with no real connection to the place...

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They are basically investors in the housing market when their money makes its own money without their direct involvement.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Depends a lot honestly - in my experience, there's two types of landlords.

  1. The person that inherited/bought an apartment, but doesn't want/can't live in it right now (because it's really remote, for example). They often buy these as "retirement homes", so something they can live in when they no longer work. While they don't live in it, they rent it to other people. The reason for that often is because their job requires physical presence and renting an apartment near their job is just cheaper if you factor in rent from the bought property.

  2. Large corporations that buy up houses left and right, make a few minor changes that classify as "modernizations" and then jacking up the rent by 33%. Those can go fuck themselves.

This omnious "landlord" that owns like 10 properties and only lives off of the rent is rare. I know a single person that does that, he inherited a company from his dad, sold it like 30 minutes after he became owner, built 3 houses with 4 apartments each and is now chillin. And I don't even feel like that's a "bad" thing, because he has literally built those houses - they would not even exist without him.

[–] Blackrook7@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just don't know those people. Also they don't all brag about it. I just learned my BIL ownes 5 rentals now and is looking at more. He also has a good day job, but he wants to transition into pandlordong full time. I know many many people like this in So cal as a construction worker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago

My mother was deserted by our father in the 60s. She had 4 children. She found a rental house. Our landlords became like family. She struggled, but always paid the rent, and our house was always well looked after. As an adult, I suspect the couple that owned the property never raised the rent. I don’t know that for sure as I didn’t have the opportunity to ask my Mom before she died. I will say that all 4 children were educated and are leading productive lives. Thank you to the kindness and humanity of that couple that were our landlords ❤️. You made such a difference in my Mother’s, and her 4 children’s lives.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 27 points 2 days ago (7 children)

A while ago my wife and I were debating on renting our home out and buying a different one. Just to break even on the house expenses it wasn't worth it.

Maybe I am wrong, but I don't understand how landlords make a lot of money unless they don't fix the house ever.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

I think the idea is that even if you only break even after mortgage and expenses, you gain equity in the house and eventually own the house which you then have at your disposal. You can continue to rent it out without the expense of the mortgage, or sell it and cash in.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The landlord I know that makes a shit ton of money inherited the homes from their parents.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah this is it, the ones who aren’t paying a mortgage on the house they’re renting out. That or corporate landlords.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

My landlord makes 48k a year off where I'm living. I can easily see how he's making money.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I was able to refinance my home at 2.8% during COVID. Now I'm paying less than $2k for a 2200 sqft home. I've got neighbors who are paying $4-6k for equivalent housing.

My mom, who bought her home in the 90s, has the mortgage fully paid off and only owes real estate taxes (around $12k annually) on a 5000 sqft property.

A lot of landlords simply inherited their homes or had enough credit to buy cheap units during the dips.

They also do a shit job of maintenance. But it can't be overstated how much of this property is either owned on extremely low interest credit or fully paid off.

you make money if you don't have a mortgage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I recently learned that my dad used to be a landlord. Problem was, he has a sense of morals, ethics, and empathy. Tennants would be unable to pay rent for one reason or another, but he wouldn't evict them because he understood that sometimes shits hard. Eventually, he had to sell all his properties to a less scrupulous landlord.

I feel conflicted with the knowledge that I could have had a better childhood if my dad was a worse person.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He could have been the type of parent to charge their children rent once they turn 16.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Remember to tip your landlord (down a staircase)

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago

Get a real job idiot.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

My landlord is the only homeowner that I can safely look down upon and tell to "get a job".

[–] OmnipresentDonut123@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

LMFAO this is so real lol, landlords have their own circlejerk claiming that market prices increased lmfao

(also if someone could help me out, when I upvote a post on Lemmy, it doesn't show my upvote or downvote or anything even after trying and reloading several times. I'm writing that on this post because it's happening on this one as well)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›