this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
445 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

What a brilliant suggestion, no way an AI could have come up with that, executive jobs are safe forever!

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

A liar, scam artist, and scumbag.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

and I thought the service was in good hands in his time... in the meantime he is a garbage person just as much as the average tech leader today

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Didn't Google and Nvidia just throw everything they had into a concerted AGI effort and fail?! 🤣

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Dude who's done nothing of importance since bouncing off google throwing words like that 😄

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Is Google in the cloning business? Because I could swear that's Zack Freedman from the Youtube 3D printing channel. He even wears the heads-up display (Youtube Link). Sorry for being off-Topic but who cares about what tech CEOs say about AGI anyway?

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds like we don't need it then.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

...and the horse he road in on.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What is the point, though?

If you made AGI, you'd have a computer that thinks like a person. Okay? We already have minds that think like a person: they're called people!

I get that there is some belief that if you can make a digital consciousness, you can make a digital super-conciousness, but genuinely stop and ask what the utility is, and it's equal parts useless and evil.

First, this premise is totally unexamined. Maybe it can think faster or hold more information in mind at one moment, but what basis is there for such a creation actually exceeding the ingenuity of a group of humans working together? What problem is this going to solve? A "cure for cancer"? The bottleneck to cutting cancer isn't ideas, it's that cell research takes actual time and money. You need it synthesize molecules and watch cells grow, and pay for lab infrastructure. "Intelligence" isn't the limiting element!

The primary purpose is just to crater the value of human labor, by replacing human workers with workers with godlike powers of reasoning. Good luck with that. I'm sure they won't come to the exact reasoning as any exploited worker in 120 nano-seconds.

It's like Jason's problem-solving advice in "The Good Place":

“Any time I had a problem, and I threw a Molotov cocktail… Boom, right away, I had a different problem.”

Sure. Let's work ourselves to death forTHIS.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Specifically, the women who report to him that he's attracted to need to spend 60 hours a week dating him.

Thanks for the input, Big Head.

[–] art@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I guess we don't need it then.

Lmfao

Yeah, Cloud Console would probably suck less too

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›