this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
1305 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5194 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

Does Firefox sell your personal data?

Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 259 points 1 week ago (24 children)

I see it said agian and agian. because its true. Firefox is one of, if not the best of the mainstream browsers. (Not included its many forks) but Mozilla is a horrible caretaker of it. Mozilla does not focus on firefox and they dont care/believe in it nearly as much as its users or devs who fork it.

The motivations of a company are extremely important, and has Mozilla does not care for a lightweight, good, privacy centric browser, the enshitification will and has corrupt firefox.

It's only a matter of time until it is as bad as chromium or flat out joins it.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 69 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Considering how critical a browser is these days.

I'm surprised there isn't a very popular Open-Source one that everyone is using.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 140 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's because it's hard to maintain a browser. There's lots of protocols and engines and other moving pieces; I remember when web pages would render in Netscape but not Internet Explorer, for example.

We take for granted how seamless and ubiquitous the internet is, but there were lots of headaches as internet devs decided to adopt or include different users (or not).

And now, it would take a lot of effort and market upset to convince the capitalist overlords to include something new in their dev stack. The barrier to entry is monumentally high, so most people don't bother to try inventing something better.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wasn’t there some stuff about the ladybird devs not too long ago?

I just hope that project doesn’t end up being the Voat or Parler of browsers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 154 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Mozilla needs to understand that I don't want it to have my data to sell or not in the first place.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago

That's the thing that bothers me about all these companies now. My data is my data, not theirs. They shouldn't even be allowed to collect it, let alone sell it or give it to anyone who wants it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (37 children)

Oh for fuck's sake! List of Firefox alternatives:

Windows/Linux/MacOS:

Android:

iOS: ??

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There’s also Servo by the Linux Foundation and Ladybird.

These are actual different browsers and engines all together compared to FF spin-offs.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago

I'm still super waiting for Lady Bird. I cannot wait to give it a try, but it's gonna be like 2026 before they start rolling out builds for general use.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable)

So in other words we sell your data and get paid for it, and some countries won't let us lie about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zecg@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate,

Fuck off Mozilla. Maybe don't pay CEOs millions and don't force things like Pocket and LLMs on users if you want to be commercially viable, I'd gladly pay for Firefox that doesn't make me dodge new features and services. But it would be a donation towards development of a browser that is commons, since you have no product to sell, only GPL'd code that's mine as much as yours.

You have NO fucking leverage, Firefox is better than Chrome, but there's projects that will gladly repackage your code with no telemetry whatsoever for any platform while you're brainstorming just the right amount of monetization to prevent the frog from jumping.

It's kind of sad I don't use Chrome and therefore never think of it, while I like and use Firefox and am therefore constantly at odds with Mozilla.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] KrapKake@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Just get "RIP" tattooed under it.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If it's really you...

Wtf?

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

It is lmfao it was my first one 🥲

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

promises don't count if you delete them. everyone knows that

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"If I put my wedding ring in my pocket, it's not cheating..."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

That clarification is not making me calm

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago

They can't just promise they "never will" and then get rid of it. People who used the service under the original agreement should still be able to claim that benefit since it was promising to never sell it.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I remember a time when Google wrote "Don't be evil" all over their stuff.....

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

dude i worked in a buncha different college libraries around the time of google's initial ascension. Google slayed. it was awesome, in 2000.

now? google is a drippy search engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is why I am an advocate for publicly-funded Internet, like how people fund NPR and BBC.

I don't blame Firefox because at the end of the day, they are still a business and need to cover the operating cost. I blame the system that we're in and the elites will tell you there is no other alternative.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 week ago

Google really needs to be broken up. They've become the Ma Bell of the internet.

[–] kingshrubb@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Glad they clarified. To me the "selling data being defined broadly" argument made sense in the context of Google paying them to be included as a search provider. Because there is an argument that Google paying Firefox, and then the user entering a search and that being sent to Google's servers could be legally seen as Mozilla selling data to Google.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ChonkaLoo@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I don't like this but it's gonna take more for me to switch. I am very happy with Firefox for my use-case and workflow it works really well. However I think they are shooting themselves in the foot by starting to take away some of the most crucial advantages with Firefox compared to Chrome. I mean if both are awful for privacy then why use Firefox?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mind you, this is just step one and other steps WILL follow. Mozilla looked at other enshittified products from large companies that make a lot of money and thought "we could have that too!"

It's a pattern I keep seeing, over and over. This is the end of Firefox as we knew it. I'm sure a good fork, run by a non profit foundation will sprout soon enough, but the name for a privacy browser won't be Firefox no more

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Mozilla is trying to increase their revenue by doing everything other than improving Firefox

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NullHippo@lemmy.today 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They're cash strapped and cash strapped companies are the worst when it comes to being trustworthy. That's all the calculus that needs to be done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Mozilla posted an update:

Update at 10:20 pm ET: Mozilla has since announced a change to the license language to address user complaints. It now says, "You give Mozilla the rights necessary to operate Firefox. This includes processing your data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice. It also includes a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the purpose of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox. This does not give Mozilla any ownership in that content."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Gahhhh this is horrible

I spent some time switching to Librewolf this morning but at the end of the day, it having Firefox as the upstream means it’s all fragile and tenuous anyway

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Son of a bitch I just got back into Firefox.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Get in loser, we’re going to librewolf apparently. Fuck me I’ve reached the age of seeing all the things I like die. I don’t even remember a time I didn’t use Firefox. God damn it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean you could argue that them defaulting to Google search is already them selling your data. Google definitely pay them for that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I moved to LibreWolf a couple of months ago. I'll move further away if I need to.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Several questions:

  1. How are they getting our data?
  2. What is the nature of the data?
  3. Can we do anything in about:config?
[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

How are they getting our data?

By setting up small pieces of code that trigger when you use a given feature, and send a network request to Mozilla's servers with either a single flag set to just show a feature was used, in general, or more additional data with context (e.g. how long the text is that users are putting into their new AI sidebar feature)

What is the nature of the data?

This section of their Privacy Notice explains what categories of telemetry data they collect.

Can we do anything in about:config?

None needed. The normal settings menu has you covered. Go to Settings > Privacy & Security > Firefox Data Collection and Use > Allow Firefox to send technical and interaction data to Mozilla

load more comments
view more: next ›