this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
500 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

69391 readers
2418 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 189 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No such thing as a death cross for a company that is now embedded at the highest level of the federal government. Don't get too excited, ass hat and the swasticars aren't going anywhere. If you havent dumped your Tesla yet, get fucked at this point.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (6 children)

There is only so much they can do to prop it up. If noone is buying them, and noone wants the stock, its going to go down short of the govt literally buying the stock and handing it over to musk.

That unfortunately would not surprise me. How sad.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tesla could literally never sell another car again, and it wouldn't matter as long as people continue to buy the stock.

It's been wildly over priced for a very long time, so clearly the people who are keeping it afloat aren't interested in whether the company is actually profitable or not.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think those people were only buying and holding cause the stock price kept going up regardless of logic and reason. These people wanted to make money.

If they think they might lose money, I think they would probably sell.

[–] zout@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're thinking rational. Tesla prices skyrocketed during the covid pandemic when wallstreetbets was gaining traction. That's probably all you need to know.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

If I recall correctly, it skyrocketed right after they posted their first profit. People took this as an indicator that Tesla was only going to go up exponentially from here.

It was actually way overpriced even before this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Til magically the government starts buying all its cars from them, and they start making tanks and drones for the military.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 19 points 1 week ago

and they start making tanks

That would be crazy. That'd be like letting Boeing make your fighter jets...

Dear god.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Plenty of Teslas were bought before most people had any idea that Elon was a fascist sociopathic asshole. Not everyone who bought one can afford to just dump a functioning vehicle with shitty resale value. Anyways, we don't really want to see every Tesla on the road retired at the same time, so somebody will be driving them.

Cybertrucks are a bit different in my estimation. Anyone who bought a Cybertruck should have known who they were buying it from. Those owners bought that car to signal something, and I think it's fair to let them know that the signal was received.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 186 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I have to be honest, as someone who is not fully immersed in the financial markets, the chart pattern reading kinda strikes me as astrology for guys in suits.

I feel this deep in my bones

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (7 children)

astrology for guys in suits

Naw they already made that, it's called the "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator".

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Different parts of astrology. The MBTI stuff replaces the horoscope/personality side of things, whereas chart reading replaces the future readings.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh my God this is so f-ing true. It makes me think a lot of sociology classes I took in college where we'd talk about the artificiality of money how it's only meaningful because we have collectively decided it is. The folks who try to make it all scientific with lots of elaborate analytics and complex charts are basically just engaging a social math exercise.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Money is an emotional thing. Do I believe that this coin / bit of paper / number on a website is something that I can exchange for goods and services? If not enough people believe that, that currency will collapse.

Mind you, not using money is inefficient at scale. Sending the bag of potatoes that I've grown in my garden this month to my internet provider for continued shitposting privileges only goes so far.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

100% totally is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I would like to remind everyone, as people seem to keep forgetting, Tesla means nothing to Elon. It could go to zero and it wouldn't affect him.

Twitter, or X, means nothing to Elon. It could collapse and shut down and it wouldn't affect him.

SpaceX is his baby. Nothing even comes close. Starlink alone guarantees he will always be one of the richest men in the world.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

That's a testable hypothesis: burn Tesla, Twitter, SpaceX etc to the ground. We can measure his reaction to each, and compare.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, he cares for Twitter.

SpaceX lets him pretend he's some great tech genius, but Twitter is what gives him the validation he craves. All the pro-Elon bots and stans there who fellate him feed his narcissistic desire to be loved.

That's why he "sold" Twitter to xAI. So if Tesla does tank hard enough and he gets margin called, he can't be forced to sell Twitter to cover it.

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If Elon is such a genius, let's see him stream Kerbal Space Program. I would love to see him get to Mun and back.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago

Tesla means nothing to Elon.

Then why did he ask Trump to shill Teslas for him? He definitely cares, for narcissistic ego reasons if not financial ones.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It could go to zero and it wouldn't affect him.

He leveraged his Tesla stock to buy Twitter. If the stock drops below a certain price, the banks will confiscate the stock. If it's not enough to cover, they'll confiscate Twitter.

But maybe I'm wrong. I would love to find out either way.

[–] dion_starfire@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

That's why he "sold" Twitter to xAI. It's no longer "his", so he can't be forced to sell it. Loopholes within loopholes, it's the billionaire way.

[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not exactly I’m pretty sure he’s using his stocks as collateral for lots of stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)

That's fine, let's still take down Tesla for good measure

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I hear what you are saying, but I still like to see Nazis hurt.

Let’s make Tesla a penny stock.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yup, this is why we need to either nationalize Starlink or just shut it down completely. This isn't something a single private company should have control of.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't this a ponzi sceme? He uses his starlink as his SpaceX customer. Without Starlink, SpaceX would be a lot less profitable.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is probably why he wants to hollow out NASA and have SpaceX take their place.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 66 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the dreaded “death cross,” a historical indicator of a likely downturn for the company

[...] occurs when a company’s 50-day moving average crosses and drops below the 200-day average.

Fuck Tesla and all that, but holy shit is that standard ever a depressing indicator of to just how reliant late stage capitalism is on endless growth that a tiny dip after half a year of stagnation is a reliable indicator of a company's imminent failure.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] piconaut@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes. But didn't the entire stock market (SPY) do the same thing on the daily chart?

collapsed inline media

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

But if they specifically call out Tesla, they get more clickbait engagement, plus it now qualifies as a tech story! Double win!

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They actually lampshade this further down the article, at the point where clickbaiting has fulfilled its goal.

It's almost nostalgic being mildly annoyed at some slightly sub-par journalistic ethics displayed by Gizmodo and company. Feels quaint and nostalgic now. I honestly didn't know Gizmodo was still running, if I'm perfectly honest. It's been quite the decade.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's only been twelve weeks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago

We can go lower!!!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

collapsed inline media

Here’s how it looks all time

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

"...the dreaded “death cross,” a historical indicator of a likely downturn for the company.

"Business Insider called out the event, which has been hitting the stock indexes of some major players over the last couple of weeks as tariff trouble has hit just about everyone. Tesla is just the latest to see the symbol of bearishness, which occurs when a company’s 50-day moving average crosses and drops below the 200-day average.x

[–] AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I checked and TSLA is still up from where it was 6 and 12 Months ago, how is it in a death cross?

Unfortunately the stock seems fine to my.

[–] gigglybastard@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

it's just a moving average cross. 50 day MA moves below 200 MA, that's it. Can be a bearish sign but I've seen it bounce in this moment a bunch of times.

But technical analsyis is just drawing imaginary lines on a chart, they know nothing about how stupid Trump and Musk are so it might very well be bearish. At least I hope so. I want to see him get margin called at 114$ or so they say.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Technical analysis is where gambler's fallacy meets self-fulfilling prophecy. Though other forces are also in play.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 both showed it as well on Monday, as the indexes continue to fluctuate in wild and somewhat unpredictable ways

Clickbait nonsense. The market as a whole is falling and these publications choose to instead write articles about each individual stock that generates headlines. TSLA stock is still up 7% for the month and a whopping 57% for the last year.

load more comments
view more: next ›