this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
108 points (99.1% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

907 readers
1308 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/pleasureismylife At 2025-04-09 09:05:28 AM | Source


all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Sakychu@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

See you in el Salvador ๐Ÿ‘‹

[โ€“] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure I want president Vance either though... I think he'd be wayyyy worse because essentially it would be president Peter Thiel / Curtis Yarvin...

Those guys scare me.

[โ€“] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Non starter. They allowed this to happen. Remove all of them anyway.

[โ€“] then_three_more@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't think your system worked like that.

In the UK parliament (well her own party really) were about to oust the Liz Truss in less time than it takes a lettuce to go rotten.

[โ€“] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The constitution intentionally doesn't have a vote of no confidence.

[โ€“] then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which really does seem to be the big advantage of a parliamentary system over yours.

[โ€“] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The point is that the presidency is more independent.

The actual issue is that there is a presidency. And a two party system.

[โ€“] eurisko@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Very straightforward and effective.