this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
426 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23691 readers
2521 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. federal court on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs from going into effect, ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from nations that sell more to the United States than they buy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Hot take: but this is going to suck. The tariffs were guaranteed to tank the economy and would be someone that no one who supported trump could staunchly defend. Now we're going to get a decade of fascists saying "but the tariffs we wanted were never actually instituted so we'll never know how good they would have been. That's why I want to do this worse thing."

Like, I understand that the liberation day tariffs were about to send the US into depression mode and I still kind of think them being blocked is a net good just cause of how bad we would have been fucked.

But God damn it's going to be exhausting.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 37 points 3 days ago

They would just move onto something else anyway, trump supporters will deflect until their death.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Republicans wrecked the world economy in 2008, destroying half the wealth in the world, and were only out of power for 2 years. No matter how bad it is, there is nothing that can pierce the reality distortion field generated by the right wing propaganda machine.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

You make it sound like they just did it effortlessly in 2008. The Republicans had been working hard on that crisis since 1971!

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That has been my position all along. I think the best thing long term is if shit gets real bad really quickly. The slower the decent the longer the suffering will be overall, and the less people are likely to notice and remember.

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It could have been super bad and we'd have still forgotten by next election.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, people were actually clamoring for the heyday of...2020...in the last election cycle. Like 2020 sucked pretty fucking hard.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Eh, with USAID gone and SNAP being gutted, a lot of the farmers are going to go bankrupt. With the Medicaid cuts, a lot of the rural hospitals (the main employers in rural areas) are going to go bankrupt. And if the "big beautiful bill" doesn't pass, all social security and medicare payments will stop until something passes. A lot of bad things will happen to the "wrong rural people".

Also, Trump has another law he can use to make tariffs with, and it will be another 6 months before the court rules on that.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And if the "big beautiful bill" doesn't pass

Another potential headache just like this one 😅

But it's still the right thing to do of course. His plans rely on compliance.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The big bullshit bill is even more dangerous than allowing the tariffs because it erodes court checks on the executive branch.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

If they get their way, and we have a depression, they'll blame the Democrats. If they get stopped before it goes that far, they'll blame the Democrats. If the Dems are going to get blamed either way, let's do it our way instead of theirs.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

That’s called accelerationism.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah absolutely this.

This is the back down Trump has been hoping for really.

When everything goes to shit he can blame everyone else because he wasn't allowed to roll out his dumb plan.

Honestly over the last few months I've been thinking a catastrophic financial crash might just dethrone trump. Not anymore.

[–] TheLiveFive@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

That's been his plan though. Whatever they let him do, he would try to do more. Then they would stop him in court, then he would blame the courts.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I was kind of hoping this fascist government would fail-fast so we could start rebuilding.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I somewhat agree with you, and I think we're also saving Trump and the Republicans from themselves here.

On the other hand, it is undoubtedly a great thing that SOMEONE has finally put their foot down and challenged Trump's authority to run the economy by fiat.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

I fully agree. Protecting us from facing the full consequences of Trump's idiotic policies is more dangerous than letting them happen. The most fervent cultists would have never seen the light anyway, but there are a decent number of people who could be convinced of the error of their ways if Trump was allowed to singlehandedly crash the US economy. Now I fear that we'll just keep going until he is allowed to do something far worse.