this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
89 points (86.2% liked)

Comic Strips

14921 readers
2097 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the rave arc continues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 66 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I understood nothing. The text sounds like total gibberish to me.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Uh oh, weird possibly sexist guys

Nvm they are just gay dudes that have the same style

after that im also lost

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Molly is MDMA,

It’s apparently burning man and all the problem guys are freaked out by the bears tripping Molly and just staring.

The last pannel, the dude on the left is a Molly bear.

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There’s the missing link. It’s been about 20 years since I knew anyone who took mdma, and back then they called it eckies.

At risk of sounding out of touch, there’s no way I could have known what anything in panel 4 was supposed to mean.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speaking as a perpetual wallflower who has never been to a rave in my life, I found it understandable. Admittedly I've heard the term "molly" in reference to ecstasy, but you see as guy wide-eyed staring at someone who looks incredibly uncomfortable about it. Seems pretty obvious that's the "molly bear" that uses "prolonged eye contact" to make "uh-ohs" so uncomfortable that they either leave or at least don't come to another one.

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Understood the spirit of the comic, not the detail or terminology.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

So... there was a possible way you could understand something in panel 4...

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)