this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
151 points (97.5% liked)

Linux

51311 readers
446 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Kitty is probably the best terminal emulator I've ever tried out... It even made me drop Tmux as multiplexer on my stupid Mac !

I only have basic use case right now, nothing complex but customization seems way above others.

The full OSC52 integration with micro for copy/past over SSH and taking up the terminal clipboard was also a game changer (nearly dropped micro because of this...)

I only scratched the surface and have only basic usage and still I can't believe one single person is behind this project (I think?).

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I like it mainly because of the image protocol and supporting both x11 and wayland. I still have alacritty installed as well because i like how damn fast it is. If alacritty had proper image support i'd probably only be using alacritty, but they are both great terminal emulators.

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yeah Alacritty was my second pick, but after reading their documentation it seemed more for people accustomed to Vi and the like.

So yeah that's not something I'm willing to spare some time right now, anyway I'm mostly doing some "sys admin" stuff in my homelab, so simple text editing in a simple terminal is a better fit in my workflow/learning process !

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I recently switched from alacritty to ghostty as I wanted image support as ghostty implements the kitty protocol for it. Ghostty seems as fast as alacrity to me, but with better support. It even has a tmux type replacement, although I haven't used it as I don't need it with sway doing that for me.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Images in the terminal? At that point you're just reinventing the GUI.

[–] juipeltje@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

It's very convenient for terminal based file managers. I use it to preview my wallpapers images and then i use a keybind to set it as the wallpaper for my window manager. I also recently started using rmpc, an mpd client that can display album art.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

you are aware that TUI has been a standard thing for ages, right? wanting GUI features inside a terminal isn't new and i'm not sure if you had a point with this comment other than trying to dunk on them..

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

As a non-user of kitty, why did it make you drop tmux? Don't they do different jobs?

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Kitty has multiplexing built in so it can also replace a lot of what tmux does (unless you're using tmux over ssh)

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

That exception is my primary use case for tmux, so that explains it.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 9 hours ago

with kitty you can open a new terminal session that sets it's cwd to the remote directory of the server you're ssh'd into. Honestly the only thing I can think of that termux can do that kitty can't is saving sessions

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Kitty can do multiplexing over ssh as well. If you have kitty installed on the remote, you can use Kitty's builtin ssh wrapper and get a lot of useful features.

https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/kittens/ssh/#opt-kitten-ssh.forward_remote_control

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Don't tend to have a terminal emulator of any kind installed on remote boxes. They're headless.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

I generally don't either, but I do install one when using a terminal that has multiplexing. The ssh multiplexing daemon is part of the kitty binary, so it needs to be installed to work. Not really different than installing Tmux on one.

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

Tmux has probably some specific features Kitty won't do as good as a native multiplexer? (sorry I'm not the right person to ask this question :s) but It has the features I'm looking for without the need to install one.

It was quite cumbersome to configure a terminal + a multiplexer on MacOS to behave how I liked it. Kitty solved this issue while being fast, simple and a lot of customization in one single app.

One feature that was really important, copy/past over SSH with Micro which involved quite a hacky thing with iTerm2 + Tmux.Also being able to split my windows, create tabs...

But as I said I have only basic use cases and can't really say If Kitty's multiplexing features are on par with Tmux. However, during my web search I read about a lot of people far more knowledge than myself who actually switch to kitty from Tmux without regrets !