this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
223 points (98.3% liked)

News

29506 readers
2478 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Delaware animal shelter is working to find new homes for thousands of chicks that were left abandoned in a U.S. Postal Service truck for three days.

Delaware's Department of Agriculture said it received a call earlier this month from USPS saying the Postal Service had an "undeliverable box of baby birds." About 12,000 chicks had been shipped from the Pennsylvania-based Freedom Ranger Hatchery to farms across the country.

State agricultural officials say that when they found the chicks at a USPS distribution center in Delaware, around 4,000 were dead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you think will happen to chickens, cows and other animals once we stop protecting them (for our consumption, but still)?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Mate you gotta have a fucked up definition of protection ngl.

These animals only exist in the first place because we breed them into existence. There are no wild factory farm chickens or cows or pigs.

If you are iffed about my reaction to the word "protection", please watch Dominion and then tell me about where in the documentary animals are protected. Warning, it shows the entire factory farm animal life cycle including the gory bits.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you put a content warning for gore on your comment? Sorry to ask, but there are annoying, rather pathetic anti-vegan trolls that try to get vegans banned. You can show prepared meals with meat in them or even raw processed meat, but not the actual process. Don't want people to have feelings when they look at meat after all. Unfortunately if you mention veganism outside of a vegan community, you will attract this troll.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah I noticed lol. I expanded the warning I included, thanks :)

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Mate you gotta have a fucked up definition of protection ngl.

Yes, protecting your food or income is still a protection, even if it sounds fucked up when talking about animals.

These animals only exist in the first place because we breed them into existence.

Mate, this was literally my point. You're crying about few dead thousand, but want a genocide.

If you are iffed about my reaction to the word "protection", please watch Dominion and then tell me about where in the documentary animals are protected

Watched it years ago, but I'm pretty sure I saw walls, fences and everything else necessary to protect them from other animals killing them young.

I fully understand it's a fucked up situation, but the extreme changes you want to do will end up even more fucked up, we should just really let it run it's natural cycle because lab meat is rapidly becoming widely available and will outcompete farming animals.

Note that I hardly eat meat, mostly when offered and not wanting to say no, but I'm trying to stay objective on this whole mess

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're definitely using the word genocide incorrectly here. A genocide would imply that the other commenter wants us to kill all farm animals right now, when in reality what they're saying is that they want us to stop artificially breeding them, meaning not creating new life. As for the animals that already exist, yeah ideally we'd find some way to help them live their lives out, but realistically this change isn't gonna happen in one day, it's gonna take years, and as we reduce artificial insemination these animals will stop existing and so this issue of having all of these animals around won't be real.

This is the equivalent of using a condom, not the equivalent of shooting someone in the face.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If humans had masters and they forced us to use condoms to prevent more of us, I'm pretty sure this checks out some definition of genocide

EDIT: Russia fully takes over Ukraine and implements a law where you can no longer make children. Is this a genocide?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is not analogous to the situation. Instead russia would not force the Ukrainians to produce children. Is that genocide?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But guy above quite clearly implied ban under vegan world, not natural cycle where farming will become obsolete.

Your example is closer to what I said we should do.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this is a plan that would lead eventually to the total destruction of the species. it's genocide

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Wrong word again. You mean extinction. A complete genocide of a species is a subset of extinction but extinction is not equal to or a subset of genocide.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago

choosing a course of action that results surely in extinction is genocidal

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mate, this was literally my point. You're crying about few dead thousand, but want a genocide.

Wait, so not artificially breeding more individuals of a species is a genocide? Is it genocide when a guy jizzes into a sock too? Come on, don't be ridiculous.

lab meat

Lab meat has been around the corner about as long as a fully self driving tesla which totally, absolutely will happen in two weeks, promise.

The fact is, we don't need to eat animals, we do it for (taste) pleasure and everything done to those animals should be viewed through this lense. Saying "I will just wait for lab meat" is a cheap excuse at best.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we don't need to eat animals

maybe you don't. you don't know what anyone else needs

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Nah that's not how it works. We all need nutrients and as long as those nutrients can be consumed in a bioavailable form it doesn't matter (for the body) where they come from.

Edit: just saw your profile and you seem to be a rage troll so I won't be engaging further with you. Byee

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago

you seem to be a rage troll

calling me names doesn't change the truth of what I'm saying

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you aren't my doctor or my nutritionist. you don't know what I need, or anyone else.

and people need more than nutrients

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and people need more than nutrients

Someone failed their science classes.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

maslow would like a word with you

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're proving my point for me. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs doesn't include meal choice, only that physiological needs are met.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 days ago

it also requires aesthetic needs to be met, social needs, and self actualization. for many people, those may require that you, for instance, master french cuisine, or eat your grandmother's lasagna, or just have hotdog and beer at the ballpark.