this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
295 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70275 readers
4554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Four months ago, we asked Are LLMs making Stack Overflow irrelevant? Data at the time suggested that the answer is likely "yes:"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 57 points 4 days ago (7 children)

So here’s what I don’t get. LLMs were trained on data from places like SO. SO starts losing users ,and thus content. Content that LLMs ingest to stay relevant.

So where will LLMs get their content after a certain point? Especially for new things that may come out or unique situations. It’s not like it’ll scrape the answer from a web page if people are just asking LLMs.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 81 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The snake eats its tail and it all degenerates into slop. Happy coding!

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The need for the service that SO provided won't go away. Eventually people will migrate to new places to discuss. LLM creators will either constantly scrape those as well, forcing them to implement more and more countermeasures and GenAI-poison, or the services themselves will enshittify and sell our content (i.e. the commons) to LLM-creators.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I worry that the replacement is more likely a move to platforms like Discord. I mean it's already happened in a lot of projects.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Discord is terrible for this.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I hate Discord with a passion. Trying to get everyone I know away from it.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If they move to Discord, nobody will ever be able to find the answers. They must use a website that is indexable by search engines or it will be pointless.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah. But this already happens, unfortunately.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, it's what I was referring to in the second part.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

I've never been accused of being a smart man.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Same question applies to all the other websites out there being mined to train LLMs. Google search Overviews removes the need for people to visit linked sites. Traffic plummets. Ads dry up, and the sites go out of business. No new content to train on 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] vala@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

You are assuming that people act in logical ways.

This is only a problem right now if you think about it.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Documentation will carry it a bit but yeah, it’ll be an issue

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because we all know how perfect documentation is. 😂

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Fair point lol

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

They're probably hoping to use people's submitted code for training. But that seems like it will be diminishing returns