this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1321 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

8044 readers
1946 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apparently so. You seem surprised that there were two people who had different opinions on the same page in the Op Eds. That's what Op Eds are.

Again, I ask, are you familiar with the concept of an Op Ed? Or are you just confused that people might have different opinions?

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both opinions agree that you should not vote for Obama, that is the editorial strategy, the different motivations are to capture the whole range of voters.

Nowadays it is even easier to do this, thank to personalized news. They can tell unemployed people that immigrants are stealing all the jobs, while they can tell taxpayers that immigrants are leaving off grants. They can even tell cat lovers that immigrants are eating all the cats.

The idea you are pushing that Op-Eds are a whiteboard for diverse opinions is either innocent or malicious.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

Op Eds are obviously influenced by the bias of the newspaper that runs them. But, there's no need to veer into conspiracy theories just because two of them happen to be anti-Obama for different reasons.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You get funnier and funnier.

Please keep telling me about how much smarter you are than I am.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just letting you prove it yourself.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So, you got nothing?

Too bad, I could always use another laugh.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The rest of us are laughing at you, so you could try that?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Op Eds are obviously influenced by the bias of the newspaper that runs them. But, there’s no need to veer into conspiracy theories just because two of them happen to be anti-Obama for different reasons.

Here you are, making the exact same point I made, in slightly different terms.

The post is about Schrödinger so me pointing it out was cromulent.

Thanks for both proving my point and making me laugh at you. You're Schrödinger's commentor; both an idiot and smart at the same time.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently you don't understand Schrodinger.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

lol!

And now you're an expert in physics too.

How can one person be so incredibly smart and talented as you think you are?

Keep the laughs coming, joke boy!

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Why so defensive buddy?