this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
684 points (95.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

38711 readers
820 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

it's like you believe you can tariff them expecting they won't do the same. Why do you believe the rest of the world is not going to retaliate and why do you believe America can prosper without the rest of the world?

What's the point of having a military alliance with countries you puts tariffs on? That's unfriendly to say the least.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

my class interests

spare me the tankie cringe

Lmao. Even just talking about class is tankie, apparently.

If I’m just comparing how shit the Russian gov is vs the US gov, your interests aren’t relevant in the first place.

I'm not, and that wasn't what the conversation was about.

Why stability/security in the West/World is vital for prosperity and won’t be possible unless Russia is defeated

"Defeating Russia" sounds extremely destabilizing. Do you genuinely want to eliminate the country through military force? That's completely insane, they're a nuclear power, you'll end all life on earth. There will be no "security" "stability" or "prosperity" in a nuclear wasteland.

So possibility A is a nuclear wasteland, possibility B is just letting them have the country and going on with our lives. I'll take option B, thanks.

Yet you think it was super difficult to predict Trumps relationship to Project 2025 lmao.

Never said this, you're lying. What I said was that it was difficult to convince voters to connect Project 2025 to Trump.

I'll forgive your lie because it seems like you're genuinely incapable of distinguishing between those two propositions, but if you continue lying about what I said, I'm walking away. Lies are a pet peeve.

Tell me, how do you know that supporting Ukraine properly doesn’t result in Russia’s defeat in, say another year

Because of my assessment of the situation. It's a stalemate, there's no realistic possibility of them reclaiming all their lost territory in the next year. Russia will win a stalemate because they're more materially invested in the conflict than the US. Eventually, the US will get bored and stop caring about it, Russia won't.

or that surrendering them doesn’t result in death camps all over Ukraine for years?

How do you know Ukraine winning wouldn't result in death camps all over Ukraine for years?

[–] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Do you genuinely want to eliminate the country through military force?

Not sure why you pulled this absurd strawman out of your ass. Who said anything about "eliminating"? They can just fuck off back to their own country, it's not that hard.

I’ll forgive your lie because it seems like you’re genuinely incapable of distinguishing between those two propositions

You said "nobody could've predicted that Trump would put project 2025 heads into government". So shove your forgiveness up your ass you tankie clown. Don't patronize me.

Because of my assessment of the situation.

Oh is this your expert military opinion? Pfft.

because they’re more materially invested in the conflict than the US.

Did you forget that I said "supporting Ukraine properly" or are you just selectively blind?

How do you know Ukraine winning wouldn’t result in death camps all over Ukraine for years?

Which side has leaders with warrants for genocide again? If that question isn't proof that you're a bad faith clown just saying nonsense for the sake of debate, idk what is.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You said “nobody could’ve predicted that Trump would put project 2025 heads into government”. So shove your forgiveness up your ass you tankie clown. Don’t patronize me.

That's a lie. Link the comment where you think I said that.

[–] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There was no way to prove to the American people that he was going to give government positions to the people behind it.

Is what you actually said, I didn't recall it too well but I wasn't "lying". Knowing he was going to put them in government was easily predictable to anyone with open eyes. Buying the "Trump distanced himself from project 2025" bs is pure retardation.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These distinctions completely change the meaning. "Being able to predict" vs "being able to prove to a broad population" are completely different things. Of course it could be predicted, I certainly did, but that doesn't resolve the question of how you get the message out on a large scale and convince people of it. Even if you and I could see through it, he still had plausible deniability, making it not necessarily the most compelling angle to hit people with.

[–] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

but that doesn’t resolve the question of how you get the message out on a large scale and convince people of it

Should be easy, given that the US has a much stronger propaganda platform than Russia no? /s

It's almost as if despite this being shown across all media, a massive amount of voters were still manipulated by foreign & right-wing propaganda into ignoring/dismissing it.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Should be easy, given that the US has a much stronger propaganda platform than Russia no? /s

Of course, the US government has a stronger propaganda platform in the US than Russia has in the US. Political parties are not the US government though, so it's not really relevant to how a political party can promote a message.

It’s almost as if despite this being shown across all media, a massive amount of voters were still manipulated by foreign & right-wing propaganda into ignoring/dismissing it.

Or they just didn't see it or pay attention or they didn't believe Trump would do it based on their own reasoning. People can believe different things from you without the need to insert a malicious actor to explain the disagreement.

But ok, your position is that nobody has both the willingness or capability to counter foreign/right-wing propaganda. So, as I've asked several times now, what is your solution to this situation? Because it seems like your solution is just to whine about it.

[–] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Of course, the US government has a stronger propaganda platform in the US than Russia has in the US.

There's nothing "of course" about this statement. All evidence points to Russia having a better handle on the US population's opinion than the US.

So, as I've asked several times now, what is your solution to this situation?

I'm not here to generate solutions, no idea why you keep asking for one. The US has a unique issue with propaganda because of the first amendment, there's no easy solution other than people smartening up and social media companies taking more responsibility for their content via fact checkers etc.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m not here to generate solutions, no idea why you keep asking for one.

Then your political position is worthless on it's face.

[–] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can point out an issue without pretending to have a solution. Do you read the retarded shit you type?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, if your goal is just to wallow in misery and jack off about how right you (think you) are.

[–] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Most conversations are about the how and why of a subject. Most of the work towards figuring out proper solutions is accurately identifying what's wrong in the first place, which you won't be able to do by larping as a revolutionary in your basement when you can't even figure out what to do when it comes to Ukraine. Nobody is waiting for your delusional dogshit "solutions". Newsflash, "just eat the rich" as advice for Kamala when brainlet voters preferred a claque of billionaires is some of the most retarded shit I've heard. Get a clue.