this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
622 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

9587 readers
2011 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

the Canadian pendulum was due to swing back to the Cons

Sure, for the opposition leader it's a matter of adding or removing momentum to the pendulum swing. He definitely added a lot of momentum, to the point that the Liberals had to throw the PM and its climate policy under the bus to get one more term. That's a hell of an effective opposition leader.

Any influence gained was because it was “their turn”, not Poilievre’s leadership.

I'm not saying that he's a genius or anything, but making good use of your "turn" is not an easy task. He has demonstrated that he's good at it, to the point of landslide victory projections 6 months ago.

would have won if it wasn’t for Trump slapping Canada in the face

And that's exactly why it's going to be easy to brush off his loss. Sure, he'll face criticism on his failure to pivot the party messaging post-Trudeau, but that was a nearly impossible situation. Would any other CPC MP have done a better job of riling up the conservatives against the Liberals without in the end get blindsided by anti-republican sentiments? Jamil Jivani? I don't see any reason to believe the CPC will have a better shot with someone else.

If they do end up booting Poilievre out of the leader seat, it will be because the CPC is a bucket of selfish snakes and lizards vying for power. It is possible. Surely someone is salivating at this opportunity. I just find it unlikely, because the vast majority of MPs are satisfied with his work and will simply bide their time, they'll be better prepared in two years.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

Look at the polling. When asked which party people preferred (ignoring leadership) the CPC had way more support than when leadership is considered.

Did you notice the CPC ads in the last week and a half didn't have PP in them? It's obvious to everyone (including CPC strategists) that PP drug down the CPC. If the CPC didn't even have a leader, they would've won. But PP led them to defeat.

But I'm not a Conservative, so if half of the CPC wants to remain faithful to PP, I'll get out my popcorn and enjoy the CPC civil war that'll happen if PP refuses to step aside.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

I disagree that he is effective in anything other than being not Trudeau and being a contrarian in the American conservative mold. If he was at all a good politician he would not have fumbled this election the way he did. The liberals made some good plays but if PP had spent one minute reading the room instead of playing party over country he might have been PM.

If he manages to hang around until the next one he will probably get in when the left splits again but it won't be because he's good at his job it will be because he has a pulse and a name on the ballot under conservative.