this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
84 points (90.4% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

902 readers
635 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/Brian_Ghoshery At 2025-04-22 12:16:17 PM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

On the topic of violent vs. non-violent: What this statistic completely fails to take into account is that violent protests on average have much more radical demands/goals. So their demands are much less likely to be met from the start because of the nature of the demand.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago

Yeah, violence happens because you've pushed those people WAAAYYYYYY further.

This post is a classic case of correlation is not causation.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Also: what does success mean? Often times, non-violent protests are met with delay tactics and empty compromises until they've died down, only for the protested thing to happen anyway. It could be that the 26% have a much larger percentage of their goals met.