this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
1345 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

7904 readers
2599 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't think a Catholic religious leader is really in much of a position to criticize Protestantism, do you? I mean I could see criticizing fundamentalism in general, but..

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think the comment is suggesting they criticize Protestantism. I think they are suggesting that US Catholics faith no longer aligns with the Vatican and that it's diverged to the point that in no longer even represents the idea of Christianity at large (Protestants) and more just some new thing (presumably where people pretend to read the Bible and just ignore all the commandments).

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Ah, yeah that's fair, I may have misunderstood. Although honestly cherry-picking the bible is neither new nor uniquely Protestant. I do wonder how uniquely American it is though, because there's a very wide streak of it through American evangelicalism but I don't hear too much about it from elsewhere in the world.

[–] BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I thought he should. I should have specified the tradcath movement and by that I mean like if you go to Twitter or related platforms you get these people claiming to be catholic and stating that they are tradcaths, some idealized version of a catholic that believes in 'traditional values' and just general MRA, incel stuff that otherwise never ever made sense in catholicism. And then you have plenty of leaders in the States that repeatedly claim to be Christian or just outright make up stuff and pretend like their idealogy is completely approved by the Vatican (or they are just so ignorant they just assume all Christians follow the same ideaology). Paula White and JD Vance are a good examples of this.

It's just that there's a growing blurring in the States of Protestantism, Teleevangelism and Catholicism that I think the pope should have addressed.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Vatican 2 (updates such as being able to say Mass in a language that people can understand) pissed off a group of weird people, who have been quietly pretending that things the Pope says about not hating gay people aren’t official Church doctrine. It is surprising that they haven’t tried to set up their own counter Pope yet.

Lots of these American trad caths are people raised in that mega church vague non denominational Protestantism where rules don’t really matter. They get a little grossed out by the corporate slickness and callous capitalism (give give give, so we can improve our million dollar sound system), so they think they can keep doing what they’re doing - just with a little more class.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Oh, yeah that's a different matter, the pope obviously has quite a lot of say about what Catholics should or shouldn't be doing (for better or worse.) But the pope trying to criticize Protestant groups would just incite some very strong backlash.