this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
816 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4237 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It garbles advertisers' data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can't work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rimu@piefed.social 83 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Google has put a lot of effort into detecting and blocking stuff like this. They call it "click fraud", if you want to look it up.

It'll just mean they start ignoring clicks from you.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago

That, I guess, it’s the whole point. Stopping being tracked 🙂

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They call it “click fraud”,

No, click fraud is using botnets to click ads in your site to increase your revenue.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When Google can't extract money from you that's fraud!

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They can still get money from this. In fact, they get more money from this than with uBlock.

They recognize how it undermines the digital advertising system, so they did everything in their power to get rid of it before it takes off.

We really should be recommending adNauseam instead of uBlock.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OK.. If trust is bro, then they won

But I ain't no middle schooler, so you need to explain like I am 5 how this solution is in fact superior to uBlock

Is there any proper research on this?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It is literally uBlock. It updates with uBlock, uses uBlock filtering, uBlock options, uBlock UI.

The only difference is that it also does ad fuckery and there is a button that you can press to configure the ad fuckery and see a log of the ad fuckery.

Other than that it is exactly uBlock.

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They can still get money from this. In fact, they get more money from this than with uBlock.

They recognize how it undermines the digital advertising system, so they did everything in their power to get rid of it before it takes off. They're fighting a generational war and don't want us to even be aware of the tools we have to fight back.

We really should be recommending adNauseam instead of uBlock.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

if enough people start doing it might be effective

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not sure how true it was, but there was a YouTuber claiming that their videos were getting entirely demonetized because too many of their viewers had Ad blockers enabled. So even though 75% of people were seeing ads on the video, Google was keeping that ad revenue, withholding it all from the creator because 25% weren't getting ads. The claim the youtuber made is that this will probably predominantly impact creators with a more tech savvy / privacy aware audience, resulting in less of that niche content.

Anyway, this is anecdotal, but I wouldn't put it past Google to pass the issue to the creators for the actions of their consumers, even though it's not their fault.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

google has way too much power. its threat to everything

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Creators who care about privacy should not support Google’s monopoly by using YouTube as their platform of choice.

[–] DNU@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

legit, there are so many platforms out there, idc which one they use, but pretty please, just mirror your content. Why's it so hard 😵‍💫. The group im referring to doesnt even have the "money ads" argument as what most small creators earn on yt is peanuts.

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Throw in a dash of track-me-not (https://www.trackmenot.io/) and maybe they'll start ignoring your search queries too! Worst case my actual searches are so buried in the bs deciding what to market would be easier from my screen-name.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

can confirm. You know those 'google rewards' things? they slowly stopped going for the results from trackmenot lol

it was nice to get $1 a month off my VPN subscription lol

[–] joshchandra@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fascinating, thanks for sharing! What is the best, current Firefox fork of this one, if you know?

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's a browser extension for Firefox, not a fork of Firefox. Or did I misunderstand you?

[–] joshchandra@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was reacting to its GitHub:

This project is NOT currently being maintained. Code is made available for developers to fork. This is the FireFox version of the project, for Chrome see https://github.com/vtoubiana/TrackMeNot-Chrome.

So I'm wondering which active fork is best to go off of for Firefox. I could've been clearer; my bad.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Then that achieves the same goal. If they're ignoring clicks from you, and you're blocking their trackers, then they probably don't have a good profile on you, because whatever they do have is either old, poisoned, or both.