this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1294 points (92.6% liked)

memes

13952 readers
1592 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sfu@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well honestly, (since you mention Christians), if they are true, they'd have to say it is the only way. Not because they are bigoted, but because all the various religions disagree. But, that view (that Christianity is the only way) may have been achieved by doing lots of research. I think its kinda foolish to say all the religions are different paths to God if they disagree with each other. Any religious person who says all faiths are valid paths to God, are either fools, or liars. Some of the popes have said that, and that would make them not Christian.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You have to accept that religions can be wrong about some things to have the view that they're all different paths to God.

Plus everyone should turn a critical eye to their own religion, every holy text and every doctrine has both wheat and chaff.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If two faiths flat out contradict each other, they can't both be right.

Faith A says that God doesn't care what you do or believe. Faith B says that God does care what you do and what you believe.

Both can not be correct. Can they both be paths to God? That's the thing, because of their statement, they'd have to believe in different Gods. So they would not be on two different paths to the same God. If they were, then God would not be stable, and in the case of faith B, God would be a liar.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you reduce an entire religion down to a single axiom, then sure, they can be entirely contradictory.

But religions aren't like that, they are each a thousand different beliefs, rituals, and directives. There are enough similarities in message to see a commonality between them.

Like you said, it's all the same path to God, some paths are a bit more meandering than others, and some claim that there are no other paths.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"But religions aren’t like that" Yeah, some religions are like that.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Religions are a single axiom and nothing else? Which ones?

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

No, what I meant was, that two religions can be contradictory based on just one belief. Depends on the belief though.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you need to be so black and white. you can pick and choose what goes into your faith, and still remain 95% christian. I guess to me the label just doesn't matter very much. also if the Pope claims that to accept all faith is christian, then that is very much what Catholic Christianity is. the Pope also plays a guiding and interpreting role, and you can choose to go with his interpretation or not.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Correct. You can have minor disagreements about some things that aren't clear. But if the bible and the pope disagree on whether all faiths are valid, then biblical Christianity and catholic Christianity are not the same faith. If the pope says biblical Christianity is valid and true, and the bible says that what the pope is teaching is false, then he just invalidated himself. See why saying all faiths are valid can't work?