this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1288 points (92.6% liked)

memes

13928 readers
2470 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've seen a lot of conservative (the American Republican model) Christians but I have also seen what I consider to be "true" Christians, with a strong faith and love for everyone, and part of that faith often involves confronting reality, thinking about solutions to problems, helping the poor and weak. I agree with you that it's not all black and white. A lot of Christians don't believe in the literal text of the Bible for its supernatural claims, but instead they read it (and other religious texts, there are a lot of religious people who do some multi-track drifting) for its morals and guiding principles, which can all be interpreted in different ways, and there is a lot of discourse in religious circles about the meaning and morals of texts, about finding ancient wisdom or reinterpreting old texts to better suit modern standards. It can be a very research intensive way of life to be religious and have faith. I'd argue that if you have any principles at all that you stick to, that counts as faith.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree. Western Christianity is a perversion of the religion imo. To be fair a large part of biblical text has absolutely nothing to do with the teachings of Christ and that confuses a lot of people. A lot of them seem to be quite contradictory to what he was saying.

If anyone is into reading interesting books these helped to clarify Christianity for me. I do not consider myself a Christian ( maybe in my next life) but Jesus was a radical cat and what he did at that point in history was revolutionary .

Leo Tolstoy , The Kingdom Of God Is Within You. This one may turn you into a Vegan Anarchist so watch out

Swami Sri Yukteswar, The Holy Science

Tao Te Ching , Lao Tzu ...this one has nothing to do with Christianity but helped me understand what God ( the Supreme Being , God Head, Jah, Allah or whatever you want to call the source) was in simple terms. It's a quick read

Paramahansa Yogananda, Autobiography of A Yogi.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That Tolstoy book sounds interesting, I'll have to check it out.

There are versions of the Bible where Big J's words are written in red text, that's what I would recommend to people so they focus on the part that matters (for Christians)

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Tolstoy was an interesting individual...and a great writer. Enjoy

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well honestly, (since you mention Christians), if they are true, they'd have to say it is the only way. Not because they are bigoted, but because all the various religions disagree. But, that view (that Christianity is the only way) may have been achieved by doing lots of research. I think its kinda foolish to say all the religions are different paths to God if they disagree with each other. Any religious person who says all faiths are valid paths to God, are either fools, or liars. Some of the popes have said that, and that would make them not Christian.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have to accept that religions can be wrong about some things to have the view that they're all different paths to God.

Plus everyone should turn a critical eye to their own religion, every holy text and every doctrine has both wheat and chaff.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If two faiths flat out contradict each other, they can't both be right.

Faith A says that God doesn't care what you do or believe. Faith B says that God does care what you do and what you believe.

Both can not be correct. Can they both be paths to God? That's the thing, because of their statement, they'd have to believe in different Gods. So they would not be on two different paths to the same God. If they were, then God would not be stable, and in the case of faith B, God would be a liar.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If you reduce an entire religion down to a single axiom, then sure, they can be entirely contradictory.

But religions aren't like that, they are each a thousand different beliefs, rituals, and directives. There are enough similarities in message to see a commonality between them.

Like you said, it's all the same path to God, some paths are a bit more meandering than others, and some claim that there are no other paths.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"But religions aren’t like that" Yeah, some religions are like that.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Religions are a single axiom and nothing else? Which ones?

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

No, what I meant was, that two religions can be contradictory based on just one belief. Depends on the belief though.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you need to be so black and white. you can pick and choose what goes into your faith, and still remain 95% christian. I guess to me the label just doesn't matter very much. also if the Pope claims that to accept all faith is christian, then that is very much what Catholic Christianity is. the Pope also plays a guiding and interpreting role, and you can choose to go with his interpretation or not.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Correct. You can have minor disagreements about some things that aren't clear. But if the bible and the pope disagree on whether all faiths are valid, then biblical Christianity and catholic Christianity are not the same faith. If the pope says biblical Christianity is valid and true, and the bible says that what the pope is teaching is false, then he just invalidated himself. See why saying all faiths are valid can't work?