this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
361 points (96.2% liked)

World News

45297 readers
155 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Most European countries moved clocks forward one hour on Sunday, marking the start of daylight saving time (DST), a practice increasingly criticized.

Originally introduced during World War I to conserve energy, DST returned during the 1970s oil crisis and now shifts Central European Time to Central European Summer Time.

Despite a 2018 EU consultation where 84% of nearly 4 million respondents supported abolishing DST, implementation stalled due to member state disagreement.

Poland, currently holding the EU presidency, plans informal consultations to revisit the issue amid broader geopolitical priorities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] withabeard@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

Mid-day should be the middle of the day. Mid-night should be the middle of the night.

If you like more light in the ~~evening~~ morning go to bed late and wake up late. If you like light in the ~~morning~~ evening, go to bed early and wake up early.

Stop fucking with the clocks and making nonsensible decisions

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Mid-day should be the middle of the day. Mid-night should be the middle of the night.

You'd need new clocks, those times drift every day, so 12:00 midday would need to change automatically.

[–] zerofatorial@lemm.ee 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah this comment makes no sense lol who is upvoting this?

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Morons, people who didn’t read it fully, and people who want to encourage discourse.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

There are a lot of regions that are put into the wrong time zone, because that's easier for business. They're not even close to 12:00 being the middle of the day especially during DST.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

It also depends on your location within your particular time zone. You can't have noon at the same time of day on both the eastern and western end of the zone.

We aren't all having the same argument. Solar noon should, indeed, be close to chronological noon, but that will only ever be true in the center of the time zone.

On "standard time" on the western end of a time zone, solar noon is (ostensibly) 11:30 am, while on the eastern end, it's 12:30. Under DST, those times shift to 12:30 and 13:30, respectively. In zones wider than 15 degrees, there can be more than an hour difference.

When the eastern end of the zone argues for permanent Standard Time, and the western end of the zone argues for permanent DST, both ends are arguing for the same preference.

"Midday" (solar noon) should indeed be close to noon, but midday should never be before 12:00pm.

The solution is to lock the clocks on one system or the other, and allow political subdivisions to move the line so their clocks work best for them.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This but unironic. Employers just do what everyone is doing, and will stop when everyone else does.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

You're more likely to win the euromillion than to successfully shift norms away from the 8:30-18:00 working hours. This shit is baked into every employment contract out there. I work an office job where it doesn't matter so much, but anyone who works shifts or a time-sensitive job is stuck there basically forever regardless of the time zone.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

If you like more light in the evening, go to bed late and wake up late.

What about people who are in school or employed?

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yes, but the EU is split into four time zones now and if you implement this technically there would be many more:

8 if we'd have 30-min time-zones 16 if we'd have 15-min time-zones 24 if we'd have 10-min time-zones 48 if we'd have 5-min time-zones 240 if we'd have 1-min time-zones

I'm not saying we should keep dst, but we can't have everyone have midday at 12:00 and midnight at 00:00.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You can keep 1 hour time zones just fine. It still puts noon within 1 hour of mid day, which you don’t get with DST.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

I can accept that. So long as after we lock the clocks on standard time, my region is allowed to switch to the next time zone to the west.

I don't think the "noon = midday" argument is complete. I think noon should be close to, but never before midday. Midday should never occur at 11:30 AM, like it currently does on the western ends of the zones.

If you are arguing for permanent standard time and you are on the eastern end of your time zone, you are making the same argument as someone advocating DST from the western end.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That’s how it was back in the day. When you walked over a couple of villages you’d have to change your watch by 3 minutes.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

I'm all for aligning life with the rhythm of nature and all, but I don't see how that'd work in current times.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you like more light in the evening, go to bed late and wake up late. If you like light in the morning, go to bed early and wake up early.

Other way around. If you want a lighter evening, your day has to slide earlier so when you sleep is closer to sunset.

[–] withabeard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep... And damn I put so much effort into working that out and still got it wrong

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

Understandable. Everyone is sleepy this week.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We need a standard system for tracking time. If every city decides their own time based on the sun it will be chaos.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Have the whole world go on UTC, that way there's never confusion.

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've had way too many conversations with people that simply can't comprehend how that works. "But then we'd have to do everything so much earlier, it would be dark all the time." I try to explain that we'd still do everything at the same time of day, just call it something different, but they just can't wrap their minds around that.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

We can't. It'd make it too easy to discover how arbitrary "9 to 5" is.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

China has one time zone, but in Xinjiang they use local time anyway. Getting everyone on one time zone for daily use is unlikely.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

Your first two lines need a caveat: ... at a local meridian as chosen by the will of the people*.

Otherwise you end up in situations where every individual location sets their clock by local noon, which varies by longitude. If you think it's bad there are a handful of different time zones across your continent, wait until it's different from one end of town to the other.

The British invented (or popularised) standard time to avoid those sorts of problems. Problems that didn't exist until high-speed long distance travel became a thing. And time zones were a later addition because Britain didn't need any, but they're also somewhat necessary.

* for "will of the people", read "will of the ruling class" as necessary. See: China.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

This is the way

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk -2 points 3 days ago

Na, we should get rid of that idea completely. If everyone used one time like UTC (other time zones are available) and just align your working hours etc to your location.

Then 14:00 is 14:00 everywhere, just that some are asleep then, others are awake!