this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
65 points (95.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36279 readers
1104 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think when it comes to blocking people, I can see some improvement there. I'm all about the idea of not adding fuel to the fire in the form of pointless online arguments and conflicts.

I see so many online platforms just fucking fail at the ways they try approaching that issue. Most places would let you block a user but they can still see everything that the blocked user has said. Like that opens the doors to exploiting and archiving. It is one thing if you're logged out and can see things site-wide than it is still being logged in and seeing what was said.

When I block someone, I want to be a ghost to them. I want them to not see anything I've said and I wouldn't want to see anything they've said either. I don't want to block them and find out they engage me on an alt just with things to continue the bullshit with.

I think the Fediverse has corrected that aspect that, when you log off, you can't see shit. So it prevents that. Though that's practiced from the instance I'm on for all I know.

However, when logged in and still blocking people, they can still see what was said by those who blocked them.

Furthermore and this is a bit of a controversial part, is that, I think moderation logs to be open is a bad idea. Again, it is to me, just one more thing to add to the fuel of a fire that isn't being let to wind down. Because people often jab and joust at others with shit like "LOOK WHUT U DID IN THUH MODERATION LOG!" and that just does nothing but escalate.

I think with some of these kinds of corrections, would promote the idea of a healthier ecosystem for the community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I actually like that blocking only stops you seeing their stuff. You shouldn't be able to stop someone else's account being unable to see your comments, that shouldn't be within your power. But if you can't see what they said, that should be enough for you, since they won't bother you any more. I'd even have it that blocking is entirely client side.

Another thing I would like though is the ability to group community and posts together so posts and comments can be linked together and smaller instances can get use without shovelling everyone to a single point of failure larger instance.

[–] pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that you like the idea of online arguments? No, I can't follow everything you've said in the first bit. If you want to argue with someone online, go do it in DMs or wherever else. Not at the expense of the community, nobody here usually comes to read sissy slapfights that usually escalate into insults and escalates into spite-reporting which drives mods/admins angry.

The Fediverse should be learning as to what not to be. This kind of behavior was very frequent on Reddit and still continues today. There should be an end to that kind of thing.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"So what you're saying..." is such a tired meme, and the irony just piles on when you follow it up by strawmanning their argument.

Wanting to block someone else from seeing what you're writing on a public forum is straight-up petty. Blocking as it works right now already does exactly what it's supposed to: it stops the other user from engaging with you further. They can still interact with your posts, but you won't know about it.

If blocking worked the way you described, it wouldn't just affect you and the other person - it'd screw over everyone else on the platform too. For example, someone spewing utter bullshit could block everyone fact-checking them, and suddenly those corrections vanish for the whole audience.

Plus, it'd be ridiculously easy to circumvent. Making a new account takes a few minutes, or just log out and boom - you're unblocked again.

[–] pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 18 hours ago

Oh god, the word salad. Not even going to try with you.