this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
608 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

78098 readers
4014 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The line between helpful tech and quiet surveillance is blurring — and our devices no longer feel fully under our control.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

We need more real Linux -- GNU/Linux, with compliant copyleft licensing -- not Tivoized crap like they put on TVs.

Roku OS, Amazon Fire OS, Tizen (Samsung TV OS), etc. -- all technically Linux, but you wouldn't know it because they've systematically butchered them to destroy everything that made Linux good (the users' freedom).

[–] Sightline@lemmy.world 42 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What's the point of being so pedantic?, they were obviously not advocating for more Roku installs.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because the distinction matters. The corporate raping of Linux has to stop being tolerated or else nothing is solved. The technical details of the kernel don't actually matter; the licensing and openness is what matters. Hell, if the Windows NT kernel got magically relicensed to AGPLv3 tomorrow it would instantly become the superior option just because of that.

Linux doesn't fucking matter. Copyleft matters.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Sigh. This kind of nonsense is why so many people get scared away from even trying linux. Who cares which distro you use, as long as it is linux it is a step in the right direction, and a whole lot of people (including myself) have taken that step very recently, despite some arrogant linux bros doing their best to gatekeep us away from even trying.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

do you seriously think roku, tizen, amazon fire are a step in the right direction?

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Yes. Kinda.

How do you think Linux devs get paid? The devices are locked down, sure, but there are strong incentives to upstream code and fund further development upstream. Linux ”won” because of this. You can’t build and develop Linux for such a wide audience and hardware flora with a bunch of hobbyists.

As Linus himself said plenty of times - GPL2 was the correct choice. Roku, Tizen, Chromebooks and Amazon garbage are absolutely within what the developers intended, and the devs are doing the work after all.

From a consumer standpoint, I absolutely agree with you, open everything is wonderful. However - commercial interests currently fund most OSS development. Without those funds, development stops and developers must take other paying jobs (probably closed source). Would be nice to change this, but then we need to completely pivot our funding model. You need to pay devs, either directly or indirectly (taxes, foundations, etc).

So far, the open source community hasn’t been very good at figuring out funding models for consumer products. It usually ends with the development team needing to put food on the table, so they add a subscription and close down parts of the project. About two seconds later, the project has ten forks and the original author can’t buy groceries.

”Buy me a beer” simply isn’t s viable mechanism to fund open source. How should we do it?

Personal preference: Slowly move the public sector towards open source, and require them to provide financial aid to products they use. Not perfect, but something that could happen gradually, without shocking the system.

tl;dr: yes, but also no.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think anyone, anywhere think of roku and amazon fire when they hear "you should try linux"?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

read this thread again, please, because you completely missed the point. but you know what, I'll help:

grue said:

We need more real Linux -- GNU/Linux, with compliant copyleft licensing -- not Tivoized crap like they put on TVs.

Roku OS, Amazon Fire OS, Tizen (Samsung TV OS), etc. -- all technically Linux, but you wouldn't know it because they've systematically butchered them to destroy everything that made Linux good (the users' freedom).

Rothe said:

... Who cares which distro you use, as long as it is linux it is a step in the right direction, ...

roku, amazon fire, tizen and co are all "linux based" operating systems. the topic was not about people recommending linux to each other, but about corporations misusing the foundations of it to further their greed. point being, something runs linux does not make it good. and that's where grue's call for real linux on these devices gets relevant.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No they arnt, but also using terminology like rape is a huge problem. He's entirely right, the avg vocal Linux user is fucking insane. And a big reason there's still much misinformation and fud around Linux for your avg user.

The worse thing for Linux is unironically it's fucking vocal users.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure, because caring about users' rights is "insane." Because caring about societal effects of (lack of) antitrust and consumer protection law is "insane." Because having an ounce of goddamn self-respect and not wanting to be abused is "insane."

No, I don't think I'm insane at all, actually. I think the people incomprehensibly arguing against me in this thread can fuck all the way off with their corporatist simping!

I agree with your morals and your end goal.

How do you want to fund the development of Open Source? Because currently most of it is funded by corporations, in turn funded by ”corporatist simping”. The expectations of the average user simply can’t be fulfilled by hobbyist developers, and then we need funding. How do we get the Windows user ”John Smith” to personally fork over money to the correct developers?

Proton/Wine/KDE would not be in their current state unless they got that sweet proprietary Valve money. In our current world we need to use corporate money to further open source, not fight it. Follow the stream and steer the flow. Given time, we can diversify funding and control.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

What the fuck? I said I don't even actually care if the kernel is Linux or NT (or anything else) as long as it's genuinely open so the user can modify it, and you somehow try to twist that as quibbling over distros?! Way to miss the point by a goddamn mile!

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

People just need to install lubuntu or some Linux distribution on their pc. Tech companies for years have forced consumer upgrades for average pc users when it wasn’t necessary.

I have a photo company in my town that still ruins dos off of windows 95 and has internet for email on windows 2000s for their point of sale machines is all dos. Even dot matrix printers. I was born in 1984 and remember this. Shows you don’t need the latest tech

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

That's great for the folks who have access to decades-old pre-enshittification technology and the means to maintain it, but what about everybody else?

Continuing my smart TV OS analogy, your answer is like saying just to use a dumb TV instead. There aren't any dumb TVs anymore! The TV manufacturer cartel colluded to quit making them!

"Just go live in the fucking woods like the goddamn Unabomber, eschewing modern technology" is not a valid solution for normal people! The law must be changed to protect them from predatory abusive corporations.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A modern tv without internet connection is a dump tv.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

It really isn't, though. It will still have a shitty UI that tries to shove the "smart" features in your face, it'll probably shove some bullshit EULA in your face on first startup, and engage in other dark patterns.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

i use my tv as secondary display on my desktop and run anything i want to watch from it.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 0 points 8 hours ago

You aren't wrong but you sound unhinged. That's coming from someone who lives in the woods and runs Mint.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social -1 points 14 hours ago

Continuing my smart TV OS analogy, your answer is like saying just to use a dumb TV instead. There aren’t any dumb TVs anymore! The TV manufacturer cartel colluded to quit making them!

Yes there are, every smart tv becomes dumb as soon as you disconnect it from the internet. Just use it the same way you would use a monitor for your computer.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Eh, the printers should be swapped for laserjet to save money and ears. I don't even know where one could buy paper for dot matrix printers either.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

The CNC machines I run at work run from windows xp. IT disconnected them from the network, so I have to get.dxf files from my engineer on a thumb drive to program machining paths from. Ain't that progress? No it's lazy.

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Tizen is actually pretty fun to hack tbh

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Can you actually install your hacked version on your TV, or is it DRM'd to prevent it? That's the only thing that matters.