this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
157 points (97.6% liked)

News

33779 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

“The 13-year-old girl begged not to be shot – ‘Please don't shoot me. Please don't shoot me,’” Judd said. “And he shot her twice.”

Just put him in the fucking gas chamber and be done with it.

[–] Thalion@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 hours ago

Should have started there, it is less tragic.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Best decision he ever made.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

We can't “be done with it” as long as guns are allowed to be manufactured and any random lunatic is allowed to have one.

The fact that a tool whose only purpose is to kill people is even allowed to exist outside history museums boggles the mind in its monstrosity.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure who told you that the only purpose for a gun is to kill people, but they were very wrong.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed. Guns are tools designed specifically for killing, but not necessarily just people.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 8 hours ago

There is the caveat that some guns were designed specifically for target shooting (like in a competition setting), but those are outliers.

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Although I agree guns need to be regulated more and there’s too many of them I think your second paragraph is unfortunately unrealistic. Did swords have any purpose besides killing people? Also some guns are used for hunting. Humans go to war and will always create tools of killing I don’t think there’s any way of removing all of those tools because someone will find a way to have them and be at an advantage over others. I’m not sure you can ever convince society as a whole to say no to violence with tools.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca -3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Did swords have any purpose besides killing people?

For the last several centuries of their widespread existence, swords were an archaism worn by people as a status symbol and to show their belonging to an in-group - like pickup trucks today in the USA.

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, but the creation of the sword was for killing people. They were a status symbol because of that. I’m sure when the next better tool comes along then guns will be the same thing.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

A fancy gun is already a status symbol.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 8 hours ago

And have been since their invention

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah fair point

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but the creation of the sword was for killing people. They were a status symbol because of that.

Not really "because of that". The heyday of the sword was during antiquity. Swords as a fighting weapon were later eclipsed by spears and polearms, and yet nobody wore any other weapon as a fashion statement. It's just that swords were much more expensive to make then a pollaxe or what-have-you, so they were owned by nobility.

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn’t really refute the core point I’m trying to make, but also polearms never really “eclipsed” swords. Sure a spear is much easier for a less trained peasant to use but ultimately a spear or polearm is absolutely garbage against a trained opponent closer than the effective range of your weapon or on a large scale battle where you don’t have enough space to maneuver it. If anything crossbows and later guns would eclipsed swords because it’s very easy to train someone how to use those quickly, and they blew through armor.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Spear-wielding infantry continued to exist well into the gunpowder era, whereas swords were pretty much only used by cavalry at that point (ironically the disappearance of armour made swords relevant again, in the form of the sabre)

[–] sparkles@piefed.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

Was one of those family annihilator+suicides. He also shot her in the face.