this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
61 points (95.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36200 readers
1879 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Doubt it. Privatization's all about making money, and making people skeptical of big pharma means that big pharma gets less money. Think of how pissed off the people making money off tylenol must have been when it was "linked to autism"

I view medicial conspiracy more as a tool to gain political power. Create discourse by spreading bs, then rally the people who fell for it so you get more votes. Pretty common Russia tactic, iirc.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Privatization’s all about making money, and making people skeptical of big pharma means that big pharma gets less money.

That's their motive, sticking it to big pharma

[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Well, there's sticking it to big pharma, and then there's...dying to ivermectin because someone read it cured covid online. Some overlap between the two groups to be sure, but I think the underlying motivations are a bit different

On the other hand, think about how much money is to be made by hawking unregulated supplements to desperate people who can’t afford real medicine.

I agree there is definitely a political element to it too, especially since COVID. I mean, shit, that’s like RFK Jr’s whole schtick