this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
121 points (90.1% liked)

Technology

77899 readers
2890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why would I want AI to play the game other than for testing?

https://nitrogen.minedojo.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riskable@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FYI: Stuff like this is for automated testing, not "playing games for you" 🤣

Also, I won't consider it realistic until it can type out, "lol git gud scrub" after ganking someone who just spawned.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Makes sense. Upscaling and video interpolation instead of optimisation. Image generation instead of artists. Now this instead of actual testing.

The 💩💩💩 gaming industry is going to somehow get even worse.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This seems like a very good use of the tech. Fuzzy testing is difficult to do, and it's all about scale

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 21 hours ago

This is all on the assumption it’ll work and be useful. The track record so far is underwhelming.

[–] riskable@programming.dev -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good games are orthogonal to AI usage. It's possible to have a great game that was written with AI using AI-generated assets. Just as much as it's possible to have a shitty one.

If AI makes creating games easier, we're likely to see 1000 shitty games for every good one. But at the same time we're also likely to see successful games made by people who had great ideas but never had the capital or skills to bring them to life before.

I can't predict the future of AI but it's easy to imagine a state where everyone has the power to make a game for basically no cost. Good or bad, that's where we're heading.

If making great games doesn't require a shitton of capital, the ones who are most likely to suffer are the rich AAA game studios. Basically, the capitalists. Because when capital isn't necessary to get something done anymore, capital becomes less useful.

Effort builds skill but it does not build quality. You could put in a ton of effort and still fail or just make something terrible. What breeds success is iteration (and luck). Because AI makes iteration faster and easier, it's likely we're going to see a lot of great things created using it.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 41 minutes ago

The capitalists will control access to the AI and compute resources, which will be the means of production in this new world.