this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
534 points (82.0% liked)
memes
18521 readers
3358 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Anywhere that is not a city? Each time these things come up, I become more and more convinced that city dwellers have no clue what it is like to live anywhere else.
I was asking which specific hell they live in, but clearly I did not phrase my question clearly.
It's just that the vast majority of people live in cities. So whatever some rural people are doing - good. But maybe y'all need to cook and not expect some poor person to work 80h/week hauling your soggy fast food around just to break even - that's not far from slavery.
If you can regularly afford delivery you're certainly way better off than them.
Yes and no, most people do live in cities (if we're still talking about the US), but a minority of those cities are actually walkable. And many cities are limited in what areas are walkable.
It's hard to find data on this obviously, so I can only speak anecdotally. Take a city like Dallas for example the core portion can be walkable, but it very quickly turns into un-walkable sprawl. Cities like Seattle and New York are very walkable. Then you have cities like Jacksonville and Orlando that are absolutely un-walkable.
I'd wager that more population lives in this un-walkable areas since the cores usually host buisnesses instead of apartments
The idea that the core of Dallas is walkable is hilarious. There are portions of DFW that have been specifically curated to be walkable, but they're usually akin to a theme park. You drive there, park in a giant parking lot (or worse, just endless strips of store front parking), then walk around what is effectively an outdoor shopping mall.
Ok but if cities are not walkable, just don't get food delivered on the regular.
You really just have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
A city may contain as few as 1 person. Cities are not defined by their total population or by their population density. Large cities are NOT the norm. You're the exception. You're the special case. You're privileged. You're rude. You're out of touch. Maybe travel.
not true
Absolutely no population requirement