387
'An Absolute Joke': Trump DOJ Partially Releases Epstein Files, Many Heavily Redacted | Common Dreams
(www.commondreams.org)
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
387 points (99.7% liked)
politics
26779 readers
2497 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
An example of a redaction: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf
119 pages of just black boxes. Fucking horseshit.
At first, I thought you meant so many black boxes on a page, that there was little information. Each entire page is a black box. There's no information at all. It's like they're mocking Congress and daring them to do something.
And they will do......exactly nothing! The fuck is the point in having laws? The fuck is the point in having a system of governance? How long until Emperor Trump dissolves congress?
Now laws? Looks like the purge is on boys
That is fucking ridiculous. This is NOT national security shit it is a pedophile ring of rich people who used airplanes and islands to molest children without getting caught.
It kind of is national security shit, if the people whose mentions were redacted have any bearing on national security. Keeping them redacted means they are vulnerable to extortion.
You can't extort someone if the knowledge is public. You are aware of this right?
I don't know if you misread their comment, but that's what they were saying. Keeping the names secret makes it (continue to be) a national security risk.
That's the point, friend.
That definitely affects the security of the Republicans' hold on power.
The only thing to remember is that they only blacked out sections where trump's name was mentioned. That's pretty damning.
Look, it's pretty damning but let's not just make stuff up. We don't need to. We can't know what was blacked out because... its blacked out. Surely Trump is in some of it, and notably isn't in the rest. We don't know who else is being protected though. I'm sure there are plenty of others.
The only way to get this admin to uncover others is to make trump try to keep saving that terrible face of his. Until the admin opens up the files, anything redacted is the most heinous acts performed by and on trump.
They recently removed a photo of Epstein's open Desk with Trump's photo in a drawer. So its not as made up as it sounds. The removed photo still made it to many news sites. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2025/dec/19/new-photos-from-epstein-files-release
I shouldn't laugh...the situation is terrible...but damn, that's gold.
Not from your doc. From volume 4, doc 7157, page 15.
Edit to add: some of this is just straight up teasing. I just opened a few that were just scanned pictures of microcasette tapes. Wtf am I supposed to do with that? Can I print it out and play it on a fax machine?
collapsed inline media
Has anyone tried datamining around the black boxes? Because this DoJ is so unbelievably incompetent I wouldn't be surprised if you could just delete a black layer to find the fun stuff underneath.
They copied and pasted the same black box. Each page is literally the same nothing burger, you can open it in a text editor and see the repeating chunks. The interesting part is that page is identical across files. They didn't even bother redacting individual parts, just replaced the whole thing.
I think people took a look and just saw empty pages. Would not be surprised to find out something later though.
I wish so badly it was one of those times they just changed the font background color thinking that would do the trick and we could all really see what they were hiding
It's happened before. We can hope it happens here.
They are bundling all of the trump documents into these single file pdfs and just completely blacking out the whole page. There's just too much shit to figure out what's incriminating and redact line by line.
"Access Denied"