this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
1261 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's wild just how much they're trying to shove AI down our throats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The new problem is AI running on the TV taking the images sent to it and processing those separately from everything else, and using that to see what you're doing and watching.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you been reading? Don’t connect your tv to wifi.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You'll have to rip the networking chip out pretty soon to stop them from sniffing out and connecting to WiFi or other devices connected to the internet.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They aren't including hardware capable of brute forcing WPA2 in a TV.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's only an issue if someone's still running an open network near you.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some tvs will attempt to connect with another and use its internet link if available. Samsung tries this.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is exactly the point I'm making. Once a few companies effectively own the market, what's stopping them from programming their devices to communicate with each other without user knowledge? I remember seeing some post about a reddit guy asking why his Samsung (or other smart brand) dishwasher was using several GB of bandwidth daily.

Hilarious idea: Wi-fi antenna dummy loads.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

If that's the case, then you should return the TV if you can or replace the WiFi antenna with a 50 ohm resistor.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So... next step is to cut it's wifi antenna and fill the ethernet port with superglue? Tech is amazing /s

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Open it up and desolder the networking chip. It's the only way to be sure. Hope you've got a heat gun!

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not? That plus a good router forcing all DNS queries to you server of choice (e.g., Asus+Merlin) is the way to go.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I take it you never heard of hard coded IP adresses and DoH/DoT.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sighs... I take you never heard that hard coded IP addresses can't bypass you router (using iptables/notables) forcing queries only on port 53 of your server of choice and that DoH/DoT servers can be blocked by a simple DNS blocklist (a feature in both ControlD and NextDNS, for instance).

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought you just needed "a DNS blocker ffs"

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That alone would solve 99% of the problem.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What other statistics can you pull out of your butt crack? Rhetorical question. Here's one I pulled out of mine: blocking DNS requests is out of reach of 98.5% of the vast majority of most users, probably. Hell. That is likely how many users don't even know about it.