this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
361 points (98.1% liked)

News

33553 readers
2144 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 123 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

If anyone is interested in having a feature to wipe your phone, GRAPHENEOS has a duress pin option that will wipe your phone from the lock screen and leave only the OS installed. AFAIK this us only available on Google Pixel devices like the gentleman in the article had.

https://grapheneos.org/features#duress

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 86 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As someone who accidentally entered the duress pin, I can confirm. It's highly effective.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

"Hey, babe. Let me look at your text messages."

"Uh, sure, let me just 'unlock' it."

"Wait, why did you say that with quotes?'

"Oh, bad news, hun, seems my phone wiped itself."

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

This arrest is the best damn advertisement ever

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago

I beleve this feature was demonstrated in Mr. Robot at one point.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My work phone has enabled "wipe if pin is wrong three times".

I discovered after my son wiped it three times. I must though it was defective and asked for replacement

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I think it needs to be "wipe if a specific pin is entered", so you can wipe it only when you intend to.

Side note, my son has called the cops on several occasions by hitting the emergency button on the lock screen. Kids just have to play with it...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Side note, my son has called the cops on several occasions by hitting the emergency button on the lock screen. Kids just have to play with it...

I've almost done this on several occasions by locking my phone and putting it in my pocket while the screen was still on. Happened way too easily.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That works only for a subset of users able and willing to remember yet another PIN. Especially one they don't need often.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It'd be fascinating to see how this plays out in the courts.

Technically it'd be the officers themselves performing the wipes, right? Could you say you got the pins mixed up in your head and get away with it?

[–] ThisNibbaCORNY@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, the "free" state of Fl*rida just made it a misdemeanor to cover your license plate with materials that prevent those fucking Flock cameras from scanning it and putting you in a database so they can use the 'ole American warrantless data purchase loophole (a time-worn classic) to sell your location data to law enforcement and other third parties and upgrades the offense to a felony if used to commit another crime which in Florida could be just about anything. They (or any red state shithole) could literally make sneezing a misdemeanor and get away with it at this point while the MAGAts cheer because only the "bad people" sneeze, not them, never. So all the red state legislatures will probably collaborate to whip up some new bullshit laws at suspiciously the same time stating that if a person attempts to wipe their phone while being detained or gives a false self destruct duress pin to an officer it's now a class a/type 1/highest tier whatever felony with up to a bajillion years in prison. Then if the courts block it they'll appeal to a different, Trump appointed judge who will rule that a person "has no reasonable expectation of privacy during detainment by a public defender because they are now legally by definition in public" or some shit all in the name of freedumb of course.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So maybe you can do something that relies on them fucking it up. Set the lock to, for example, 43o1. Set the duress pin to 4301.

If asked for the pin, say "four three oh one". Chances are good they'll interpret the "oh" as a 0. They can play back any recordings they have as evidence, and you'll clearly be on record saying something that was not the pin they typed in. You did not mislead them.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is actually some ridiculously smart advice. Do they have alphas in unlock code?

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago

Looks like yes, you can use a duress password, which to me implies alphas.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fl*rida just made it a misdemeanor to cover your license plate with materials that prevent those fucking Flock cameras from scanning it

That's not even remotely new. It's been illegal to cover a licence plate with anything that obstructs it being read, manually or otherwise, for as long as we've had licence plates.

They may have tweaked the language a little here and there; but that law has always been around in some form.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well one could possibly coat the license plate with a material that left those cameras unable to scan the plate, while any human could read it just fine, not even knowing there was something different about it. I would be totally in favor of that.

[–] ThisNibbaCORNY@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

The original law? What's the wording on that I wonder...

[–] ThisNibbaCORNY@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Before it was a traffic infraction. At most you would pay a fine. Now it goes on your criminal record.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

I think the prosecutor is going to drop the charges because I don't think he broke a law. So we'll not find out..

But also, the defendant doesn't have to prove anything and would probably be wise not to testify in court. If you decide that you're going to testify at all, then they can ask you a lot of other questions that you probably don't want to answer. So almost all of the time you should shut the fuck up. :-)

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I need to hurry up and install that