this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
657 points (89.0% liked)

memes

18399 readers
2268 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand that civilians are under no obligation to follow the rules of language, but writers should be striving for precision in their language. Impressionism doesn't really work for literature. You can't be blurry.

Won't read the rest, this is enough for me to understand you're now either arguing in bad faith, or are ignorant of how language evolves. Is English you first language? Look up the contributions of Shakespeare to the language. Are you Italian, like "piccolo" could suggest? Look at Dante Alighieri.

Your language would be different without the freedom that writers take over the ages, and for one thing you're unhappy about, there are a myriad you don't even think twice about, and hopefully, quite a few metaphorical and poetic idioms that you find beautiful.

I won't engage further. Have a good day.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The concept that precision in meaning isn't important to writing is silly. Literary license is one thing, but using words that are flatly wrong and then demanding they be accepted is nonsense.

Would you be so understanding if some artists wanted to start labelling the color red as blue, because they feel like it, and they don't care how confusing it is, or how dumb it makes them look?

Or if musicians started playing random accidentals in their Bach performances, because they don't feel it's important to alter keys at their whim?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Or if musicians started playing random accidentals in their Bach performances, because they don't feel it's important to alter keys at their whim?

That would be the equivalent of a writer inserting bacon random words.

The musical equivalent would be a musician making a deliberate choice to alter the performance because they like how it changes the piece. I would be perfectly fine with that.