this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
526 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

77072 readers
3323 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following the same legislative and narrative pattern as the EU for “Chat Control”, similar laws and rhetoric are now cropping up in the US. The narrative is “save the children from porn” but the action is censorship, mass surveillance, and the elimination of privacy on the Internet.

As of this writing, Wisconsin lawmakers are escalating their war on privacy by targeting VPNs in the name of “protecting children” in A.B. 105/S.B. 130. It’s an age verification bill that requires all websites distributing material that could conceivably be deemed “sexual content” to both implement an age verification system and also to block the access of users connected via VPN. The bill seeks to broadly expand the definition of materials that are “harmful to minors” beyond the type of speech that states can prohibit minors from accessing—potentially encompassing things like depictions and discussions of human anatomy, sexuality, and reproduction.

Wisconsin’s bill has already passed the State Assembly and is now moving through the Senate. If it becomes law, Wisconsin could become the first state where using a VPN to access certain content is banned. Michigan lawmakers have proposed similar legislation that did not move through its legislature, but among other things, would force internet providers to actively monitor and block VPN connections. And in the UK, officials are calling VPNs "a loophole that needs closing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 78 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

At some point we'll just have to tunnel IP over DNS, and then they can't block traffic without destroying the entire internet. Not that it'll dissuade them.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Emi@ani.social 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This method actually has bigger throughput if you need to transfer lot of data.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

RTT is just 'a bit' slower than via usual transfer channels.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 15 hours ago

pingfs

Now that's something I must try.

[–] the_trash_man@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago

"Legislators Want to Ban the Internet"

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 21 points 16 hours ago

Well, no, it wouldn't. The bods that make these decisions still live like it's 1950 and dream of an authoritarian future of masters and slaves.

What good is The Google or The AI when you're sipping champagne up an ivory tower or out on the ocean being waited on hand and foot on a gleaming yacht?

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

It will just be a few approved sites that you are allowed to visit, and just by chance those sites are the ones that pay the goverment the most! Those sites will have records in the approved DNS, that you can not change. Other DNS requests are blocked, along with everything else that isn't approved.