this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)

News

33367 readers
2910 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this fall, a team of security experts at the AI company Anthropic uncovered an elaborate cyber-espionage scheme. Hackers—strongly suspected by Anthropic to be working on behalf of the Chinese government—targeted government agencies and large corporations around the world. And it appears that they used Anthropic’s own AI product, Claude Code, to do most of the work.

Anthropic published its report on the incident earlier this month. Jacob Klein, Anthropic’s head of threat intelligence, explained to me that the hackers took advantage of Claude’s “agentic” abilities—which enable the program to take an extended series of actions rather than focusing on one basic task. They were able to equip the bot with a number of external tools, such as password crackers, allowing Claude to analyze potential security vulnerabilities, write malicious code, harvest passwords, and exfiltrate data.

Once Claude had its instructions, it was left to work on its own for hours; when its tasks were concluded, the human hackers then spent as little as a couple of minutes reviewing its work and triggering the next steps. The operation appeared professional and standardized, like any other business: The group was active only during the Chinese workday, Klein said, took a lunch break “like clockwork,” and appeared to go on vacation during a major Chinese holiday. Anthropic has said that although the firm ultimately shut down the operation, at least a handful of the attacks succeeded in stealing sensitive information.

https://archive.ph/obiAj

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I remember seeing this article before. Keep in mind that the publisher of the report has a financial interest in promoting their AI’s “agentic” capabilities. In the report they state that AI can replace skilled teams of hackers. For a target taking security even somewhat seriously, that statement is hard to believe and really underlines their financial incentive.

I argue this isn’t novel at all. At the end of the day, you’re still generally scanning the Internet for vulnerable systems. Script kiddies have been using this broad recipe for decades. I think this is more accurately an incremental improvement in automation rather than the paradigm shift that Anthropic would have you believe.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think this is more accurately an incremental improvement in automation rather than the paradigm shift

This is the most succinct summation of the history of AI since ChatGPT first premiered. There’s some cool stuff the models can do, none of it is going to be the world changing trillion dollar industry it is presenting itself to be