this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
219 points (97.4% liked)

Not The Onion

18690 readers
1919 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] watson@lemmy.world 87 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

What is his obsession with “auto pen”?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 60 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Trying to cast doubt on anything Biden signed into law.

If he's successful the democrats better spend just as much time reversing anything Trump has signed too.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 16 points 13 hours ago

Just need to declare sharpies as an invalid signing instrument and that wipes everything Trump ever did.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

And by extension, setting precedent on repealing laws based on procedural nitpicks rather than substance, meaning a LOT more laws might be up for debate.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

They should be doing that anyways.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You start with the result you want and work backwards:

C. Everything Biden did should be undone.

B. Biden did something frequently

A. Say any use of innocuous thing is invalidated

You see it a lot online, when people say X is true because of Y. But if they admit Y is flawed, that doesn't change their mind about X. They'll just invent a new reason.

[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He takes great pride in his own stupid signature and is offended that others don't give a shit as he does? Also, shit spamming the news.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

His signature that looks like a death-metal band logo?

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's the nicest thing I've ever heard about his signature, and those logos deserve better.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Artistically, it's pretty bold. It's got rhythm, it's dynamic, it's insistent in its method. It's just that its legibility is worse than that of a Russian doctor's cursive writing, which for me is a visual companion to James ‘Blood’ Ulmer's ‘Timeless’. This is however fine for a death metal band logo — would work even better for grindcore.

collapsed inline media

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 5 points 10 hours ago

I sometimes think he's just scared of the spooky pen moving like a ghost was using it...

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

What the fuck is an autopen?