this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
199 points (95.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35688 readers
1784 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to let people know why I'm strictly against using AI in everything I do without sounding like an 'AI vegan', especially in front of those who are genuinely ready to listen and follow the same.

Any sources I try to find to cite regarding my viewpoint are either mild enough to be considered AI generated themselves or filled with extremist views of the author. I want to explain the situation in an objective manner that is simple to understand and also alarming enough for them to take action.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For the ecological side of things, sure, ai uses a lot of power. Lots of data enters. So does the internet. Do you use that? So does the stock market. Do you use that? So do cars. Do you drive?

There are many, many differences between AI data centers and ones that don't have to run $500k GPU clusters. They require a lot less power, a lot less space, and a lot less cooling.

Also you're implying here that your debate opponents are being intellectually dishonest while using the same weasely arguments that people that argue in bad faith constantly employ.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The fact that a gou data center uses more power than one that does not does not matter at all.

You're completely missing the point.

The sum total of power usage for all non ai data centers is an ecological issue whether ai data centers use more, the same, or less power.

All data centers have an ecological footprint, all use shitloads of power, and it doesn't matter if one kind is worse than any other kind.

This is exactly what I was trying to point out in my comment.

If I take a shit in a canoe that's a problem. Not an existential one but a problem. If I dump another ten pounds of shit in the canoe it doesn't mean the first pound of shit goes away.

If I dump two pounds of shit in the canoe then the first pound of shit is still in the canoe. The first pound of shit doesn't stop being an issue because now there are two more.

You can have an issue with shit in the canoe on principle, which is fine. Then it's all problematic.

But if you're fine with having one pound of shit in the canoe, and find with three, but not okay with eleven, then the issue isn't shit in the canoe, it's the amount of shit in the canoe. They're distinct issues.

But it's NOT intellectually honest to be okay with having one pound of shit in the canoe and not being okay with the other two. You can't point at the two pounds of shit and say: this abominable! While ignoring the other pound of shit. Because it's all shit.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But it’s NOT intellectually honest to be okay with having one pound of shit in the canoe and not being okay with the other two. You can’t point at the two pounds of shit and say: this abominable! While ignoring the other pound of shit. Because it’s all shit.

Sure, because that's a terrible analogy.

Gen AI data centers don't just require more power and space, they require so much more power and space that they are driving up energy costs in the surrounding area and the data centers are becoming near impossible to build.

People didn't randomly become "anti-data center". Many of them are watching their energy bills go up. I'm watching as they talk about building new coal plants to power "gigawatt" data centers.

And it's all so you can have more fucking chat bots.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

When a family in the global south uses coal to cook their food, they release CO2. When a billionaire flies around the continent on a private jet, they also release CO2.

Do you consider the two to be equivalent in need or output?