this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
918 points (96.6% liked)
/r/50501 Mirror
1149 readers
3 users here now
Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
People who don't claim absolutely do subsidise people who do. Where do you think the money goes?
People who smoke pay more in taxes, because cigarettes are heavily taxed. Similar story for people who drink a lot of alcohol and the like.
And why apply this mentality to healthcare and not other things? Assuming you're a high earner, you'll pay for roads that other don't, for education, for the military, police, fire brigade, etc. Should all of this stuff only be accessible to people if they pay for it directly? How would that even work?
You completely disregarded my point where most insurances price premiums depending on risk; which Medicare does not, besides maybe cigarets.
Education, police and firefighters should be accessible for all; and obviously abusers should be punished, as in people who burn their house on purpose.
There’s a strain on healthcare resources that is avoidable if people would just eat a bit healthier and exercise a bit more.
Maybe if you don't need to spend so much in healthcare you can spend a little more in better food.
Subsidizing healthier food options and encouraging people to exercise can be a start.
If you can go to the doctor without paying you go whenever you start feeling sick. That saves money and time. And you have better health, so you can work better and with less stress. That's cheaper than having to heal you when you are really sick.
Yes. Additionally, you likely won’t need to go to the doctor as often if you eat healthy and exercise regularly.