this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
110 points (98.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35667 readers
1847 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mech@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

People were happier in the stone age than they are in first world countries today.

Our brains did not evolve for the lifestyle we're living today.
I sure as fuck would be happier out hunting, gathering and making handcrafted tools during the day, then telling stories by the campfire wrapped in a fur at night.
Even if there's no toilet paper, I could get mauled by a bear every day, and if not, the tribe will leave me behind on the next migration when I'm too old and weak to keep up.

I'd rather live 30-60 years like that than edit another Excel sheet. Sadly, our "civilization" made that way of life completely impossible.

[–] EponymousBosh@awful.systems 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the tribe will leave me behind on the next migration when I'm too old and weak to keep up.

FWIW, this part is almost certainly not true.

https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/these-4000-year-old-bones-reveal-a-shocking-secret-about-humanitys-earliest-caregivers

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/06/17/878896381/ancient-bones-offer-clues-to-how-long-ago-humans-cared-for-the-vulnerable

https://news.usask.ca/articles/research/2017/ancient-spinal-injury-a-story-of-survival.php

These are just a handful of these types of stories, there's loads more if you want to search for them. But the upshot is: your family or tribe would have taken care of you to the best of their ability, for as long as they could, and you would have been given a decent burial when you died.

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I know that, but what choice is there when the reindeer leave and Grandpa can't walk anymore?

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] EponymousBosh@awful.systems 2 points 7 hours ago

I don't know, but apparently people had some way of managing.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it's the 'noble savage' myth.

which is really a play on the 'ignorance is bliss'. as if babies are 'happier' than adults or something.

[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

To be fair, stone age life has some drawbacks too. Few would want to potentially die to a failing tooth, die to any kind of disease or starve to death if winter is harsher than expected.

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I agree that few would choose that life.
I still believe those who were forced to live that life led happier (if shorter) lives.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

infection, and predation, and probably starvation, or poisoning from eating a poisonous plant or animal, or dying from venom. not so much happyness.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I think of something like a compound bone fracture. Today, with modern medicine, that's a routine and easily treatable injury. But at any point up til just a few centuries ago, a compound fracture was a death sentence. A clean single break could be reset, but multiple pieces require surgical intervention and alignment. And that just couldn't be done safely. The physicians then just didn't know how to prevent infections enough to make that surgery survivable. Plus they didn't have x-rays to guide them, etc.

One day and you take a fall. Nothing extraordinary. You don't fall off a giant cliff hundreds of feet to your death. You fall off a small 4' high ledge. You land wrong, and you break your leg in a compound fracture. And that's it. You're now a dead man crawling. There's nothing anyone on Earth can do to help you.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

The level of violence was fantastically high like worse than a war torn country all the time for everyone. Along with all the starvation and disease which nobody could do anything about because even washing hands or what a disease is is completely unknown.

Starving by age 5, getting your head bashed in by 20 or a really ugly disease death before 30. Also you spent all your time struggling to have enough to eat continually.

[–] scripty@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I kinda agree with this. The usual argument against this is usually something along the lines of "but you'd probably die of dysentery by the age of 40". But I think I'd be okay with that. Better to have lived a short life outside an office than to live to be a 100 spending 45 years in an office.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Better to have lived a short life outside an office than to live to be a 100 spending 45 years in an office.

That's a choice you can still make today. What's keeping you from doing so?

[–] scripty@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Because I've made choices like having a spouse who would rather live a long life, and kids that I didn't have at the age of 18. I'd like to be there for them. I get what you're saying though.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I think we all feel that way from time to time, but the way I know it isn't true is that the closer you actually are to losing civilization and the comforts it provides the less you want it. Freezing your ass off in the rain? Nobody craves the stone age then.