this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
389 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

76986 readers
2834 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Can't current CPUs decode it in real time?

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, because of the ASICs built into them to enable that decoding.

Without that, a 4K HEVC video is in upwards of 100+ billion operations/s to decode on the CPU. Which limits you to high end CPUs getting capped out on something you essentially get for "free" otherwise

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I meant without dedicated circuits, obviously. Can't it be parallelised? Many cpus have a lot of relatively idle cores at a given time...

I remember that my 486 had trouble with mp3 files, but soon enough, I got a new machine with many more spare cycles.