this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
267 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
267
Browser Fingerprinting And Why VPNs Won’t Make You Anonymous (hackaday.com)
submitted 19 hours ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Amidst the glossy marketing for VPN services, it can be tempting to believe that the moment you flick on the VPN connection you can browse the internet with full privacy. Unfortunately this is quite far from the truth, as interacting with internet services like websites leaves a significant fingerprint. In a study by [RTINGS.com] this browser fingerprinting was investigated in detail, showing just how easy it is to uniquely identify a visitor across the 83 laptops used in the study.

As summarized in the related video (also embedded below), the start of the study involved the Am I Unique? website which provides you with an overview of your browser fingerprint. With over 4.5 million fingerprints in their database as of writing, even using Edge on Windows 10 marks you as unique, which is telling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I remember in 1996 my neighbor was in one of these fancy new things on the internet called a "chat room".

He got into an arguement with someone. It got heated. Until the other guy threatened to show up at my neighbors house.

My neighbor scoffed and laughed.

Then the guy put in my neighbors real address. To this day, that still scares me. And back then internet crime wasn't taken seriously. In fact doxxing back then may not yet have even been a crime.

[–] pumpkin_spice@lemmy.today 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

FYI:

https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/doxxing-free-speech-and-first-amendment

In the US, "doxxing" laws are pretty much state-by-state and many may be violating the first amendment.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Today, yes. In 1996 "doxxing" wasn't a term. The internet was so new to people that nobody knew what it could even do.

I'll give you a great example. I remember watching a news report fall of 2000, where K*B Toys was trying this untested idea. Could they use the internet to sell things? The experts said no, and that the internet was a fad. It simply wasn't a medium you could use for commercial things......ebay aside.

In 1996 Google didn't even exist yet. I don't think Amazon was even a bookstore yet. The internet in those days was primitive, and the wild west of the technology realm.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Those were the days where if you knew someone's real name and town that they lived, you could just go and get the telephone directory for that area (the library had all of them) and look up their address and phone number. It would have to be quite a big town before you found multiple people with the same name.