this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
148 points (94.0% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
35645 readers
3656 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some parts of the bible are shown to have been written about 400 years later
I don't see where I said otherwise.
The implication is incorrect.
What is it that you think I was implying with my post?
This is the post you replied to
The implication was that it was not correct because of a reply that starts with:
The original post says that "the Bible" was written "hundreds of years after [Jesus's] death." I consider this to be an incorrect statement. When someone says "the Bible," I wouldn't think of only the most recently composed passages, but as a whole, from Genesis to Revelation.
This doesn't mean that those recent passages weren't written hundreds of years after Jesus died, only that I wouldn't identify that point in history as "when the Bible was written."
Except english language discussions on writing would generally be fine with how the post you replied to is written.
If an author writes a book for several decades then publishes it we would generally say "it was written" up to the publishing date even if sections of the book had not changed significantly for decades before publishing it. So I think its completely correct english to say "The Bible was written hundreds of years after christ lived" even if parts of it were written when he lived.
I agree that its misleading but I disagree that it's incorrect because its correct linguistically and its correct in the broader point that essentially "Christ would likely not quote documents written after his existence" with the caveat being that he may quote documents that eventually found their way into the old testament unchanged.
I don't disagree that one can generally talk about books in that way, but given what I know about how biblical authorship, I think it's an incorrect (or as you say, misleading) way of describing the Bible specifically.
Of all the books that became canon in the Christian Bible, the most recent ones were written in the late 1st/early 2nd century CE. The later edits were additions, deletions, or alterations to these existing works rather than entirely new books on their own, and by the time those edits were made the books were already being used as scripture in Christian communities.
I'd liken it to The Hobbit. The first edition was published in 1937. In order to align more with The Lord of the Rings, a 2nd edition was published in 1951, and it contained significant changes to the the characterization of Gollum and the function of the One Ring. However, despite those changes, I would never say that, "The Hobbit was written in 1951."
My final note: you can see in my first post that I agreed with the sentiment of the post I was responding to: that, "Christ would likely not quote documents written after his existence," as you said. Many words have been put into the mouth of Jesus of Nazareth, because everything written about him came after he was too dead to make corrections.