this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
283 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

18642 readers
787 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Isn't unchecked capitalism just delightful?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reversedposterior@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

For the sake of argument, what would you call a seat that was not next to the aisle? I'm not defending them but at the same time I'd understand window seat just means 'against fuselage', yet I agree this is a confusing term.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wall seat or outer seat, I would think.

It was only because of airlines' decision to change seating layouts that made it out of alignment with the aircraft's windows to maximize capacity, and since then they have been attempting to redefine the what a window seat is.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

“Outer seat” is good. Of course I think that after reading this whole article and having all the nuances in my head. Anyone who sees that term in a booking interface will not know what it means.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've thought it over again after reading your comment, if airlines really wanted to weasel out of offering a window, and didn't want to call it an 'outer wall seat' for clarity, they could call it a "window-side seat", "window-adjacent seat", or "window-end seat". That would be like the American product saying "chocolate-flavored candy", where it's technically true and only misleads enough not to be afoul of the law.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that’s closer to the mark. It’s so subtle. Can you call it a window-adjacent seat if it isn’t adjacent to a window? I’m sure a marketer somewhere can find the right weasel-word :D

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just don't charge extra and when customers pick a seat indicate the lack of a window. You'll find a passenger who doesn't care.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just don’t charge extra

Exactly. That's literally the salient point.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don’t. Aisle seats sometimes cost extra due to the slight bit of extra room to wiggle around in, but window seats never do (as far as I’m aware) - because it’s not actually an advantage to sit by a window. This is a nothingburger of an article.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

They don’t. Aisle seats sometimes cost extra due to the slight bit of extra room to wiggle around in, but window seats never do (as far as I’m aware) - because it’s not actually an advantage to sit by a window. This is a nothingburger of an article.

"As far as I'm aware", nice save. Maybe read the article before you dismiss it?

Both airlines were accused of unfairly charging extra for some window seats without warning that there wasn't actually a window there.

Aviva Copaken, a plaintiff in the United suit, said she paid as much as $169.99 to choose a window seat, only to find out upon boarding that she only had a view of the cabin wall.

While American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and Ryanair are among the airlines that warn customers about this in the booking process, United and Delta do not, the suits say.

How nice of you to play for big corpo that habitually rips off customers by always skirting the extent of what the law allows them to get away with. They must be called out - to the fullest extent of the law - whenever they overstep, however little.

I'm sure multiple lawyers and countless plaintiffs decided to go to court over a "nothingburger".

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Fair enough! I’m always happy to be corrected.

That's a fair point!

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Wall seat. It's not hard. If window seat just means next to a wall that may have a window, it's a still a wall seat, even if there's a window. A window seat is always next to a window because that's literally what defines it as a window seat.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I’d call it bulkhead, but that term’s already used by seats in the front row of the section. Wall seating? Hullside?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the sake of argument, what would you call a seat that was not next to the aisle?

Cabin view.

[–] logi@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it doesn't have a view of a cabin. Not even of the woods!

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It was just a plane or something

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

Exterior, medial, interior?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The reality is that yes they are “against fuselage” seats which almost always means a window, but due to aircraft design, has a small chance of being up against a solid wall. They are saying that “window seat” is a descriptive term but not a guarantee because of this. I’m sure that in most cases where this has ever caused real concern, flight crews were able to reseat people to adjust or airlines compensated the aggrieved flyers or I don’t know people fucking sucked it up and moved on with their lives.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just say "window/wall". And if customers ask "well why are you charging extra" say it's bc some people like to sleep while leaning against the wall. (true!)

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

There's also people who don't give a f about the view but just rather not sit next to more than 1 stranger.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Lil Jon intensifies