this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
750 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

76820 readers
1793 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A few days ago, Davuluri shared his excitement about it on his official X handle. He seemed very eager to reveal what the company has in mind at the upcoming Ignite event regarding the agentic OS plans.

Unfortunately for Microsoft and Davuluri, the response has been overwhelmingly negative, so much so that the comments on that X post have now been disabled.

Made me laugh. :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Remember, they said Windows 10 was the last version you'd need. The last version.

In a country full of people that get a chub at the thought of litigation why hasn't this angle been pursued?

[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Because in the USA, private individuals don't have meaningful access to the legal system. Realistically, the best you could possibly hope for in a case like this would be a settlement in a class action where every Windows 10 user who's willing to jump through a bunch of hoops ends up with a seven dollar check in half a decade.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

That was never actually an official statement. It was an offhand comment by some staffer that didn't carry any legal weight nor accurately describe the internal trajectory for Windows in any way. As much as we like to poke fun at it regardless.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

It was the last version I needed. Six months gaming on Linux and I haven’t looked back.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was always a dumb statement. Microsoft had two places to go from there. Either iterate and keep the name like Mac OS X was doing (10, 10.1, 10.2 and so on) or go to 11... like macOS also did (after a while).

They were never gonna release a version of Windows called Windows 10 and never update it or improve upon it (as they see it).

[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They had iterations already, like 22h2 or whatever.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

They used to be called service packs.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Major builds. They used to be YYMM (from 1507 to 2004), and changed to half a year at the end - 22H2 is the Windows 10 build for the second half of 2022.

In total, there were fourteen of these, with 22H2 being the final one.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Because puffery. It's a interesting deep dive, look it up.