this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
511 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

7755 readers
921 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Hot take: Rural drivers shouldn't get a say in how urban roads are designed

It's not their city. They don't live in it. They can stay in their town if they don't like it

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

My thoughts exactly!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

They can stay in their town if they don’t like it

Literally no. By definition small towns don't have a lot of things in them, and so the things they do have tend to be pretty basic. If you need specialist medicine, for example, you definitely will have to go to a major city. And that's not even getting into the open countryside people, who exist in at least the less dense European countries.

I mean, you can still hold the position they shouldn't get a say, but not that they can totally opt out of whatever is decided.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If they don't want to live where there is nothing then they shouldn't have chosen to live where there is nothing

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago) (1 children)

Wait? Do you ever eat food? I'm guessing you do. That comes from the middle of nowhere for the most part. Certain other products too.

If you open a history book, it's cities that are optional. Yes, people who choose to be farmers or otherwise live outside of cities have to deal with long commutes to a city when they need something. If they were banned from even doing that, there'd just be starvation.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 5 seconds ago

It's not the farmers that clog up cities' streets

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well, if they want to come to the city they should leave their car outside and take public transit or a bike.

If that's a viable option, definitely, but it isn't always and I can tell you public transport in Ireland is incomplete at best.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago

Okay, sure. But they will have to do it, and you will need some parking on the outskirts.

[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is it not crazy to think that people in rural areas also enjoy the city and go to urban areas? It's still the same country.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

As visitors though. I don't think their needs are irrelevant, but they shouldn't carry as much weight as the daily users'

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So the inhabitants of small towns driving daily to work to the next city get a say? I don't know about Switzerland, but in my area these are a considerate amount, if not the majority of cars in smaller cities. Most don't need a car living in the city, but you cannot commute into the city without in most cases.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Would you consider someone who uses the road daily as a daily user?

If so, re-reading my comment will provide a solution.

Not sure it's visiting necessarily if it's their nearest urban center, as then it would be their main source of a lot of stuff so it's theirs too.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That sounds fair but urban people don't seem to have any issue with forcing their opinions on speed limits on rural people. If it works one way then why not the other?

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They can drive however they want in their villages. But they need to follow our rules when they come to town.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They can drive however they want in their villages

They can't though, they have to follow rules and speed limits that are set by people not in their villages.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? If Lausanne sets a speed limit of 30 km/hr in Lausanne that does not change the speed limit in Morrens or Bercher or Savigny.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The article literally states that Ireland's department of transport lowered the default rural road limits for the country in February, that's exactly the sort of thing I had in mind.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The article literally states that Ireland's department of transport lowered the default rural road limits for the country in February, that's exactly the sort of thing I had in mind.

No. The article states that URBAN is speed limit is set at 30km/h. RURAL road is already limited to 60km/h.

By rural they are talking about roads that are not within limits of cities. Note that town/city limits are much more defined in Europe. Usually the last house at the edge of town defines the end of the urban area and the beginning of the rural area.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

RURAL road is already limited to 60km/h.

That is what I said, yes. The point was that rural people in the same country as this urban change have already had their roads affected by people who don't live near and use said roads.

Edit: The relevant quote from the linked article:

In February, the default speed limits on rural local roads decreased from 80km/h to 60km/h.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How are they not affected? No one lives on rural roads. Everyone lives on urban roads. Rural roads are for driving between urban areas.

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't know about Ireland, but in a lot of countries a lot of people live along rural roads.

And a lot of people walk or bike along rural roads, they also deserve to live safely.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're responding to a comment using Swiss speed limits as an example. Here in Switzerland changes in the speed in an urban area do not cause changes in rural areas.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

And you're commenting in a thread about Ireland, so I used a more relevant example. Nonetheless, I expect even Switzerland has things like country wide default speed limits and has its rural road speed limits set by a group in cities or at least the regional centres rather than each village getting to freely choose its own for the roads around it.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz -4 points 4 days ago

Anyways, I suppose I should thank you for providing more evidence that drivers are selfish morons.