this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
280 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

76839 readers
1479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Passkeys are built on the FIDO2 standard (CTAP2 + WebAuthn standards). They remove the shared secret, stop phishing at the source, and make credential-stuffing useless.

But adoption is still low, and interoperability between Apple, Google, and Microsoft isn’t seamless.

I broke down how passkeys work, their strengths, and what’s still missing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 56 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The eco-system lock-in makes this a non-starter for me. If I could store the private keys in something like a keepass vault (or that) and do the authentication magic from that I would consider it.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

You can? At least I do that. I host vaultwarden myself and store the passkeys there.

Passkeys to me are just a better way to autofill in login data.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

OK, now think how nontechnical people will not be able to do it. They will be tied to Google/X-corp for all credentials, even government ones. Waiting to be banned if their social credit is too low.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago

That's the root of the problem. Nontechnical people don't use good passwords, but all the ideas we have for replacing them are only usable by more technically minded people.

There are a variety of other reasons why passwords are bad, though.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 days ago

OK, now think how nontechnical people will not be able to do it.

Nontechnical people can use BitWarden/Keeper/Proton Authenticator/any other major system like that instead of self-hosting.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

True. But I would say that this isn't an issue intrinsic with passkey. Many people don't have time/energy or the attitude to think critically about technology and are herded towards Google/X-corp/etc with offers of convenience and because they are often the only offered choice on the web sites. But from the POV of passkey they just act as a password manager.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 5 days ago

Oh I'm stoopit. I just looked up the documentation for keepassxc and it supports it too:

https://keepassxc.org/docs/KeePassXC_UserGuide#_passkeys

So I guess the next time I create an account that supports it I'll try it and see how it goes.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

KeePassXC supports passkeys directly through the Browser Integration service.

https://keepassxc.org/docs/KeePassXC_UserGuide#_browser_passkey_support

There you go. Local, serverless passkeys in the software of your choice.

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I am not dependent on any ecosystem for passkeys. I have a self-hosted vaultwarden instance that works with Bitwarden clients. I create and store my passkeys over there primarily and in my keepass db (which I primarily use for TOTPs) for redundancy. So if either one gets compromised, I can just delete the passkey for the accounts involved in that database.