this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
159 points (96.0% liked)

News

33088 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The deal, negotiated by a group of Democrats and GOP leaders, funds the government through Jan. 30. If it passes, it will still need to clear the House, which will likely take days.

WASHINGTON — Senators struck an agreement Sunday, projecting confidence that it will be sufficient to end the lengthy U.S. government shutdown, three sources with direct knowledge of the details told NBC News.

The agreement, reached by a group of Democrats who teamed up with Republicans, should have the necessary 60 votes to clear the Senate, these sources said. It would then need to pass the House and earn President Donald Trump's signature to become law and reopen the government.

Even if it has enough support to clear those hurdles, the process is expected to take days.

The agreement contains a “minibus” — three full-year appropriations bills that will fund certain departments like Agriculture through the end of the fiscal year next fall — and a continuing resolution to fund the rest of the government at existing spending levels through Jan. 30.

It would also fully fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, once known as food stamps, through next September, a major flashpoint in the shutdown.

The sources said the deal also reverses Trump’s attempted layoffs of federal workers during the shutdown through RIFs, or “reduction in force” notifications.

But in a major concession from Democrats, it does not include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. Allowing the funds to lapse would raise insurance premiums for millions of Americans unless they are extended. Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain, two of the sources said.

Even then, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said he won’t promise that the House will vote on extending the subsidies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 198 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

I think what the headline means to say is "In exchange for nothing, Democrats sell out their constituents"

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Democrats lubed up their arseholes and bent over for the repubs. How do the do-nothing democrats make you feel now?

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Sick to my fucking stomach

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 14 hours ago
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’m disappointed too, but there’s a reasonable chance the huge expected jump in healthcare costs will bite the GOP in the ass…

Just look at MTG

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 66 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah the thousands of people who are going to die, be bankrupted, and or go homeless in the meantime probably don't give a fuck about how it might change the elections in a year.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And lets be honest, it's not going to change the elections either since nobody is willing to use their vote for anything but more garbage from both of these parties.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 6 points 12 hours ago

Those unwilling to use their vote are equally contributing to the garbage.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

tbf the millions of people who are starving probably don’t care about health insurance premiums

and the innocent people in gulags probably… well, they probably care about the starving people because they’re not monsters but lets say they have their own priorities

i agree with the sentiment but republicans presented only horrible, cruel options and democrats were forced to choose

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 hours ago

tbf the millions of people who are starving probably don’t care about health insurance premiums

Yeah, because paying MUCH more for something else that you ALSO need in order to stay alive and be able to work REALLY helps with being able to afford food!

republicans presented only horrible, cruel options

True

democrats were forced to choose

And by caving to the Republicans in exchange for a temporary band aid and empty promises from known liars, they made an awful choice that's going to kill MORE people than holding firm would.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

"In exchange for agreeing to stop doing all the illegal stuff"

So, kinda?