this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
225 points (95.9% liked)

politics

26738 readers
2341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Governor Gavin Newsom holds an early edge over Vice President JD Vance among young male voters for the 2028 presidency, according to new polling from a Republican-affiliated firm.

The latest League of American Workers/TIPP survey, conducted October 22-28, shows that among young men, 38 percent would vote for Newsom compared to 33 percent for Vance.

The findings suggest that Newsom—a prominent Democratic voice—continues to outperform expectations with a demographic that has trended toward the GOP in recent years. The results come amid renewed debate within both parties over how to win back young men, a group increasingly seen as pivotal to future national elections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 115 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Don’t run Newsom. Run AOC

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It'll be Harris all over again. JD sucks but in no way would I be enthusiastic about voting for Newsom.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago

I'd prefer him over Harris I think, but wouldn't be very happy with either

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So far I think he’s better than Hillary Clinton. I also don’t really know what he stands for.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He stands for corporations as far as I can tell. Occasionally he is on the right side of things, seemingly on accident.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

Everyone responding "at least he isn't as bad as that other corporate Democrat" is just sad.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think there’s no way in hell Harris would win a democratic nomination. The stink left on her from losing to Trump will be very hard to overcome.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think she'd be great. I'd vote for her if I could.

We need more good Senators.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Think she could win a democratic nomination? I think it’s going to be very hard for her to overcome that loss.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think she'd slot into Schumer's slot nicely. If AOC doesn't grab it first.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

NY is definitely not an easy state to win statewide elections. But I hope she does. She deserves a much bigger platform.

Edit: I hope she does. Somehow I said the opposite of what I meant.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was not and would not be enthusiastic about voting for Harris - but I would vote for her.

I straight up would not vote for Newsom.

I think we have our answer.

It's AOC.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Democratic primary is going to be INTERESTING. God I hope we don’t fuck this up.

While I would love AOC, she would be the youngest by quite a bit. Plus, she probably needs to win something more than a house seat. It is great having a party leader that is so young.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The problem with the party leadership route is that party insiders are the only ones who get to vote on it, and when that's the electorate she can't even beat Gerry Nadler. If she can run in a race with real people voting on it I think she could beat anyone.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Copy and pasting from my other comment

Her highest accomplishment is being a House of Representatives member. This is incredibly rare. Most people that become president have been elected in a statewide election, or had military, or were a part of the office in some way already (VP, secretary, etc).

To go from being a House of Representatives member to being president is a massive uphill battle.

I hope she runs and joins other democrats on the debate stage. It would raise her profile in a big way. She would have my vote for sure. But I would not get my hopes up simply cause of her experience level.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump never held office before being elected president. What he had was fame. Guess what AOC has in spades?

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Integrity, respect of her constituency, and empathy.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So because she isn't in the hierarchy, too easy say less burn the hierarchy down. IDGAF about your perceived "uphill" battle if she has the words and is elected in the primaries full send.

Literally, Trump wasn't shit before and had a shitty first term and they re elected him.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The primary is the uphill battle. She’ll have my vote at all stages probably.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, you're right, shit I forgot what those were.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

This please...

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Newsom is infinitely more likely to get elected in a national election unless we suddenly develop class consciousness.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Always saying centrist candidates are the only ones who can win and then running only centrist candidates is a self fulfilling prophecy that doesn't even have a good track record.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember when Harris was running, and everyone kept telling us that Leftists don't come out to vote? Remember them telling us that she should keep moving to the right, despite the fact that Leftists are way more popular?

Get ready for more of that with Newsome.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember them telling us that she should keep moving to the right

I don't remember anyone saying that, the general consensus seemed to be people criticizing her for embracing Liz Cheney and moving to the right.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you don't remember anyone saying that, it's because you weren't paying attention.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/23/briefing/kamala-harris-convention-speech.html

Hell, search posts here for "leftists don't vote", and you'll find a lot of simps explaining that it's "akshually smart of her" to keep moving to the right.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

It is also possible that the morons on this site who say dumb shit like that were on my block list for saying other dumb shit.

Or memories aren't perfect and I just don't remember every stupid thing people say.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

But Newsom made funny Twitter posts.