this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
234 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

4530 readers
777 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The investor who bet against the US housing market in the run-up to the 2007 financial crisis has now placed a significant wager on the collapse of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

What's an accessible way for a non-wealthy person to bet against the AI bubble?

Yes I understand that this is tantamount to gambling.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Puts on nvidia and palantir is what he bought, basically, with palantir:nvidia at 8:2 ratio so he has far more confidence palantir will blow up (in a bad way).

Note that if you don’t know what this means, or if your only knowledge of “buy puts” is buying them via an app like robinhood, keep in mind you don’t know nearly enough about the risk involved and this could blow up in your fucking face real bad.

Especially in the unlikely scenario AI crashes extremely hard (eg palantir goes to 0) and you have a naked put - using today’s closing price of $190 if you chose a strike of $180 your max profit is $285 per contract but your max theoretical loss is like 18,000 per contract if it drops to 0 (again, unlikely, but a more realistic scenario wherein it drops to say, $150 - you’re out almost $3k per contract). With a naked put your goal is for the price to hit the target, basically, so the closer to 180 the better (without dipping below) and this wouldn’t be a good idea for what you’re asking, but just an example of how the wrong play could lose you tons of money. A naked call goes the other way and as a result can be infinite loss. Retail investors (ie you) have lost six figure sums playing with this, life ruining shit, avoid avoid avoid

Options that are safer if you don’t want to get this involved in what is ultimately literal gambling: take a degree of separation. Instead of puts directly on nvidia or palantir puts on qqq, xlk, aiq, or some other etf that is made up of AI bullshit. Spreads risk but limits payoff. Use the strategy this nerd used: long dated puts. Keep in mind this is more expensive up front and for the retail investor you’ll generally max out 6-12 months realistically. He did 4-5 years out but that came with additionally complexity (especially for the billions in contracts he held) which meant tens of millions in payments to secure the contracts each year, which made his investors furious (though they ended up eating shit because he made them 730 million and over 100 million for himself on top of that).

Just keep in mind that options trading has ruined many people who know what they’re doing and it’s ruined way way more who have no fucking clue but think they do (I’m in this category). For every dipshit that makes millions off of gamestop there’s probably a hundred people or more like the people from reddit that post shit like this

collapsed inline media

Don’t end up like that person. There are so many of them on reddit. They succeed with a few trades, get up 5k, 10k, 50k, then get greedy and have mad hubris and believe they’re now “elite traders” so they piss it all away, often in a handful of trades over a few days/hours because the loss causes them to panic and try to recover with foolish long shots. The sad thing is you’ll read some where it’s like “I’ve been poor my whole life and I finally got a 30k inheritance, got it to 45k” and then a screenshot like that where they pissed it all away in a day to functionally hand it to some 1%er nepo baby hedge fund manager who is worth 15 million and has never wanted for anything in their life. Then they talk about all the debt they could’ve paid off and it’s like “what the fuuuuuckkk duuuudeee”

Don’t buy naked puts and absolutely do not ever buy naked calls, which have unlimited risk, though I don’t know why you would in this scenario (or ever really). If nothing else please at least read this part.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, WSB was wild in its heyday. The loss porn was crazy.

[–] MacFearrs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago

While I don't think it's good to encourage what is basically glorified gambling, it was mental to watch from the sidelines the crazy shit people did on there pre-GME. After that it all went a bit conspiratorial and "get rich quick!"...

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

GME completely ruined WSB.

[–] Atlas_@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

What?

Lot of confusion in this post.

Buying a call or a put always has limited downside, which is the amount you used to purchase the contract. Now, it's still super easy to lose your shirt, but far from the "infinite loss" (it's not infinite, just unbounded) parent mentions.

It is much riskier to sell options. Don't sell options. The one scenario that possibly has "infinite loss" is if you SELL a naked call. Many brokers will not let you do so.

But most of that is besides the point. The way that you would make this play as a retail investor is buying puts. On Nvidia or what you expect to crash directly. If you think the whole market, then SPY. DO NOT BUY OPTIONS ON ALREADY-LEVERAGED INSTRUMENTS LIKE QQQ. It doesn't work out like you would hope - it's not extra leverage, you just get eaten by decay.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t follow your reasoning on large losses when buying options, even naked ones. When you own an option you have a right but not an obligation. Do you mean selling options?

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

I think they meant selling, yes. But also, most brokers for the commoner won't let you trade options without specific interest/understanding, yet alone sell naked options.

[–] mormund@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago

If you have positions in companies that are overvalued due to the AI bubble, you can sell them or better yet place a stop loss. That way you can still benefit from the bubble further inflating, with less risk that you hold the bag at the end.

Other than that, invest in unrelated companies/ETFs with less weight on these companies. You'll still crash with the rest of the market but should recover faster than those in the AI bubble.

Don't try to do anything fancy. You'll have to gamble to time the pop and even if you're right, you may still get outperformed by someone with just an S&P500 ETF over that time.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Less risky: sell stock you hold in nvidia or other AI heavy companies. Invest in non AI.
Risk to the max: short nvidia stock. Each month they don't crash, your wallet hurts.

Just know that Burry is more confident in Palantir crashing than Nvidia (considering how much he's shoring each).

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

If you're in the US, that's just part of daily life at this point. Employment? Food? Water? Shelter? Sanity? Hope? 🤷🏼‍♂️ Pick three, and roll' em!

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

For me those stats are very low, can I roll perception instead?

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

Animal Handling or Performance, your choice.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Do you want ennui? That's how you get ennui. (Pfft. Rolling Perception in a dystopian blightmare. This guy. Ha!)

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You can't "generally" bet against it with any reasonability. You need to be specific.

If you want to gamble on WHEN the AI bubble will pop, you buy large amounts of cheap puts on big-tech at a price substantially lower than where it is today.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Sell your index funds and tech stocks.

Buy Berkshire Hathaway (who’s sitting on a big pile of cash for crash buying, as they do), Walmart, and bread and butter ones, companies that make things folks would still buy in a recession (like groceries).

Don’t mess with shorts. You don’t know when the bubble will burst, and these companies will make you money even if it never does.